【摘要】 长期以来，儒家井田论被打上复古、迂阔的标签。本文通过将经学视角引入井田制的经济思想史脉络，尝试重新激活井田问题。现代学术将井田制视为西周时期的土地制度，而往往忽视了制度背后的价值追求。简言之，经典世界中的井田制表现为两种模式，分别以《公羊传》《周礼》两经及其汉代解释为代表。两种模式分别指向不同的经济平等观念，今文学重视“均劳逸”,古文学重视“均赋役”。一种具备了经学视角的经济思想史，有助于揭示出制度建构的价值基础是如何形成的。更多还原

【Abstract】 For a long time, the Confucian theory of the well-field system has been labeled as outdated and pedantic. In contrast, this article attempts to show the significance of the study of the well-field system. To this end, it adopts a perspective of classic hermeneutics. Modern scholarship regards the well-field system as a land system in the West Zhou dynasty, and thus ignores the value pursuits behind it. Indeed, the well-field system in Confucian classical works manifests itself in two models, which refer to different conceptions of economic equality. One is the balance between work and leisure, while the other is the balance between taxation and corvee.更多还原