节点文献

以问题为导向的县域医防融合评价指标体系构建

Development of a problem-oriented index system for evaluating the integration of medical treatment and prevention at county level: a Delphi study based on the rainbow model

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李灿灿李程跃王子荆白忠良陈任沈群红徐凌忠蒲川马安宁高俊文汪华郝模胡志

【Author】 LI Cancan;LI Chengyue;WANG Zijing;BAI Zhongliang;CHEN Ren;SHEN Qunhong;XU Lingzhong;PU Chuan;MA Anning;GAO Junwen;WANG Hua;HAO Mo;HU Zhi;Key Laboratory of Public Health Social Governance, Philosophy and Social Sciences of Anhui Province, Anhui Medical University;Research Center for Health Development Strategy of Anhui Province, Anhui Medical University;People’s Hospital of Fuyang City;Research Center for Health Development Strategy, Fudan University;Health Service Management Branch,Chinese Preventive Medicine Association;The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University;School of Health Management, Anhui Medical University;School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University;School of Public Health, Shandong University;College of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University;Shandong Second Medical University;Health Commission of Anhui Province;Jiangsu Commission of Health;

【通讯作者】 胡志;

【机构】 安徽医科大学公共健康社会治理安徽省哲学社会科学重点实验室安徽医科大学安徽省健康发展战略研究中心安徽省阜阳市人民医院复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心中华预防医学会卫生事业管理分会安徽医科大学第二附属医院安徽医科大学卫生管理学院清华大学公共管理学院山东大学公共卫生学院重庆医科大学公共卫生学院山东第二医科大学安徽省卫生健康委员会江苏省卫生健康委员会

【摘要】 目的 构建符合我国县域医防融合工作实际的评价指标体系,为引领和推动县域医防融合工作科学发展提供指导原则和评价手段。方法 以彩虹模型为理论依据,通过政策分析、文献复习等方法确定县域医防融合评价指标体系的理论框架和备选指标库;运用德尔菲专家咨询法和层次分析法确定指标体系及其权重。结果 两轮专家咨询的积极系数分别为87%和100%,权威系数均值均为0.79,意见协调系数分别为0.222和0.359(均P <0.05);经过两轮专家咨询后建立了包含6个一级指标、15个二级指标以及37个三级指标的县域医防融合评价指标体系。结论 指标的构建有适宜的理论指导,遵循了科学方法,符合科学程序,过程严谨、结果可靠;对促进和提高未来我国县域医防融合工作的科学性和可持续发展具有现实指导意义。

【Abstract】 Objective To construct an evaluation index system in accordance with the practical implementation of county-level medical treatment and prevention integration in China, and to provide guiding principles and evaluation tools for its scientific development. Methods Using the rainbow model as a theoretical foundation, a theoretical framework and a pool of candidate indicators for evaluating county-level medical-preventive integration were established through policy analysis and literature review. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process(AHP) were used to determine the index system and corresponding weights. Results The response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 87% and 100%, respectively, with an average authority coefficient of 0.79. The coordination coefficients of the expert opinions were 0.222 and 0.359(both P < 0.05). After two rounds of expert consultation, an evaluation index system was established, which included 6 first-level, 15 second-level, and 37 third-level indicators. Conclusions The construction of the index system was guided by appropriate theoretical principles, followed scientific methodology,adhered to systematic procedures, maintained rigorous processes, and produced reliable results to promote and enhance the development and sustainability of county-level medical-preventive integration in China.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(72374046);上海人才发展资金资助项目(2020128);公共健康社会治理安徽省哲学社会科学重点实验室项目(PHG202309;PHG202401);基层健康协同治理安徽省高校优秀科研创新团队项目(2023AH010036)
  • 【文献出处】 中国公共卫生 ,Chinese Journal of Public Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年12期
  • 【分类号】R197.1
  • 【下载频次】68
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络