节点文献

《学衡》与《新青年》诗学观念的参差对话

Uneven Dialogue on Poetic Concept between the Critical Review and New Youth

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 马建高

【Author】 MA Jiangao;School of Literature, Yancheng Teachers University;

【机构】 盐城师范学院文学院

【摘要】 《学衡》内在诗学观念的贯通,具有隐伏的本体论与方法论层面的潜在脉络。由文学自身的思考出发,强调诗文差异与内在格律,是《学衡》诗学观念的本体论建构;而作诗的具体实践,先学文而学诗,由摹仿而创造,“以新材料入旧格律”,此三者构成《学衡》诗学观念的方法论论述。从诗、文、小说的文类视野审视,《学衡》坚持文字本位的态度,坚守诗优于文、文优于小说的诗学观念。《学衡》的文学论点乃针对《新青年》而发,然而其文学理念与当时的社会风潮产生隔阂,仅能完成自身理想的“独立性”。《学衡》从边缘发出的向“中心”主流《新青年》的质疑,必须等待不同间隔的时间审视,而断定其是否将时时刻刻皆处于“边缘”,这是值得进一步思索的论题。

【Abstract】 Poetic concepts in the Critical Review have a ontology and methodology potential. Starting from the thinking of literature itself and emphasizing differences between poetry and prose and internal rhythm is the ontological construction of the poetic concepts of the Critical Review. The specific practice of poetry writing is to learn poetry after learning prose, to create from imitation, and to “put new materials into old patterns”. These three constitute the methodology of the poetic concept in the Critical Review. Examined from the perspective of poetry, prose and fiction, the Critical Review adheres to the attitude of writing standard and the poetic concept that poetry is superior to prose and prose is superior to fiction. The literary argument of the Critical Review is directed against New Youth, but its literary idea is estranged from the social trend at that time, and can only achieve its own ideal of “independence”. The questioning of the mainstream New Youth by the marginal the Critical Review must be examined at different intervals of time, and whether it will always be “on the margin” is a topic worthy of further consideration.

【基金】 国家社科基金后期资助项目“《学衡》与《新青年》文学观念比较研究”(23FZWB069)
  • 【文献出处】 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ,Journal of Yanshan University(Philosophy and Social Science) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年04期
  • 【分类号】I206.6;G237.5
  • 【下载频次】7
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络