节点文献

GB/T 4732—2024《压力容器分析设计》中棘轮评定方法的解读及应用

Interpretation and application of ratcheting assessment methods in GB/T 4732—2024 Pressure Vessels Design by Analysis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 沈鋆粟雨平陈志伟陆明万刘应华

【Author】 SHEN Jun;SU Yuping;CHEN Zhiwei;LU Mingwan;LIU Yinghua;School of Energy and Power Engineering,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology;China Standardization Committee on Boilers and Pressure and Vessels;School of Aerospace Engineering Tsinghua;

【机构】 上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院全国锅炉压力容器标准化技术委员会清华大学航天航空学院

【摘要】 针对防止承受复杂循环载荷的承压设备和部件发生棘轮失效的重要性,各国标准给出了相应的评定准则。我国新修订的压力容器分析设计标准GB/T 4732—2024《压力容器分析设计》中对棘轮这一重要失效模式给出了弹性分析、简化的弹塑性分析和弹塑性分析等3种评定方法,对该标准中3种棘轮评定方法的分析要求及修订的理论背景进行了详细的解读和探讨,通过算例着重介绍了新标准中简化的弹塑性方法和弹塑性方法的应用,并验证了棘轮评定中的这两种方法的一致性,旨在为工程设计人员更好地理解新标准提供参考。

【Abstract】 For the pressure equipment and component subjected to complicated cyclic loads,it is very important to prevent ratcheting failure.Therefore,the corresponding assessment criteria are given in international codes around the world.Three assessment methods for this important failure mode of ratcheting are provided in the newly revised standard GB/T 4732—2024Pressure Vessels Design by Analysis,which are based on elastic analysis,simplified elastic-plastic analysis and elastic-plastic analysis respectively.The analytical requirements and the theoretical background for revision of these three ratcheting assessment methods were interpreted and discussed in detail.Finally,based on an example,the application of the simplified elastic-plastic analysis method and the elastic-plastic method in the new standard were presented and the consistency of them in ratcheting assessment was validated with a view to providing useful reference for engineering designers to better understand the new standard.

【基金】 低碳热力发电技术与装备全国重点实验室开放基金项目(HBC-663459)
  • 【文献出处】 压力容器 ,Pressure Vessel Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年07期
  • 【分类号】TH49
  • 【下载频次】77
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络