【摘要】 对“非法索财型”信访进行准确的刑事评价是信访工作法治化的必然要求，不仅有利于统一司法裁判，而且能够有效维护信访工作秩序。信访人通过越级上访、重复信访等方式向信访机关索取财物的行为具备构成寻衅滋事罪或敲诈勒索罪之可能，司法机关对此应当审慎研判：一是要厘清“非法索财型”信访与行使权利之间的界限，二是要对非访行为扰乱信访工作秩序的程度进行综合判断。面对非访行为，各地信访机关一方面要全面改进统计、通报、考核工作，推动信访工作监督追责法治化；另一方面要建立、完善信访工作专项资金使用方案，推动信访工作办理法治化。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the increase in citizens’ awareness of rights protection, excessive rights protection in the field of petitioning has gradually occurred, which has led to a large number of cases of“money demand type”petitioning in practice. In this paper, hooliganism is not a necessary element for establishing the crime of provocation and harassment; whether the petitioner’s behavior of demanding property from the petitioning authorities by taking the way of petitioning at different levels and repeating the petition constitutes the crime of provocation and harassment or the crime of extortion and blackmail, the judicial organs should prudently judge whether it constitutes the crime of provocation and harassment or the crime of extortion and blackmail, and the first is to clarify the boundaries between“demanding property”and exercising the right to petition and petitioning. Second, a comprehensive judgment is to be made according to the specific circumstances to determine whether the degree of disruption of the order of the work of letters and visits. In the face of non-visit behavior, local petition authorities should comprehensively improve statistics, notification and evaluation, and promote the rule of law in the supervision and prosecution of responsibility for petition work. The second is to establish and improve the use of special funds for letters and visits to promote the rule of law in handling letters and visits.更多还原