【摘要】 探讨乡村潜力评价中评价指标权重的确定方法，比较主客观赋权法对评价结果的影响。首先，通过文献综述以及专家访问构建了较为普适性的乡村发展潜力评价体系；其次，通过问卷调查、现场调研的方式构建云梦县乡村潜力指标体系，选取云梦县229个村庄作为样本，分别采用层次分析法、熵值法、CRITIC(criteria importance through intercriteria correlation)法、独立性权重法、信息量权重法计算云梦县乡村发展潜力指标权重；最后，采用线性加权计算得到这5种方法的评价结果，并对5种方法确定权重的云梦县乡村发展潜力综合指数值结果进行相关性分析。结果表明：1)229个乡村研究指标的信度系数值为0.733，数据信度质量较高；2）熵值法和信息量权重法之间的相关系数值呈现显著的正相关关系；3)5种方法得到的乡村发展潜力综合指标之间存在显著的正相关关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper discusses the method of determining the weights of evaluation indicators in the evaluation of rural potential, and compares the influence of subjective and objective weighting method on the evaluation results. Firstly, through literature review and expert visits, a more universal evaluation system of rural development potential is constructed. Secondly, the rural potential indicator system of Yunmeng County was constructed through questionnaire survey and field investigation. 229 villages in Yunmeng County were selected as samples, and the weights of rural development potential indicators of Yunmeng County were calculated by analytical hierarchy process(AHP), entropy method, criteria importance through intercriteria correlation(CRITIC) method, independence weight method and information weight method respectively. Finally, the evaluation results of these five methods were obtained by linear weighting calculation, and the correlation analysis of the numerical results of the comprehensive index of rural development potential of Yunmeng County with the weights determined by 5 methods was carried out. The results show that: 1) the reliability coefficient of rural research indicators of 229 villages is 0.733, and the quality of data reliability is high; 2) there is a significant positive correlation between the weights of entropy method and information quantity method; 3) there is a significant positive correlation between the comprehensive indicators of rural development potential obtained by the five methods.更多还原