【摘要】 在建构“中国自主的知识体系”的背景下，有必要对比较教育学科建设的研究成果进行回顾，以进一步明确其发展方向。围绕“建设有中国特色的比较教育学”和“比较教育的学科危机与转型发展”两大话语，比较教育学科建设研究的重心经历了由本体论到价值论和方法论的转变。在本体论层面，中国学者坚持比较教育是一门“学科”，并致力于澄清其内涵和研究边界。在价值论层面，学界对比较教育不同价值的关注和重视程度是不同的，而对于在当下或者未来比较教育在我国应该扮演何种角色或者发挥何种价值，不同的研究者也有不同的见解。在方法论层面，研究者更倾向于将社会科学的研究方法引入比较教育以弥补研究者在方法上的无意识，但“拿来主义”的态度也导致方法论研究缺乏重心。未来比较教育学科建设应该聚焦于自主知识体系的建构，在不断回应中国教育改革的实际需要中寻求知识创新。为此，比较教育需要建立自己的学科规范，并加强比较教育研究者的基础理论的学习和研究方法的训练。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the context of constructing an "independent Chinese knowledge system," it is necessary to review the research achievements in the field of comparative education to further clarify its developmental direction. Focusing on the discourses of "constructing a comparative education with Chinese characteristics" and "the disciplinary crisis and transformative development of comparative education," the emphasis of research in this field has shifted from ontology to axiology and methodology. On the ontological level,Chinese scholars maintain that comparative education is a "discipline" and strive to clarify its connotations and research boundaries. In terms of axiology,the academic community exhibits varying degrees of attention and importance to the different values of comparative education,with diverse opinions on the roles or values it should embody in China now or in the future. Methodologically,researchers tend to incorporate social science research methods into comparative education to address unconscious methodological gaps,yet this "borrowing" approach has led to a lack of focus in methodological research. Future construction of the comparative education discipline should concentrate on building an independent knowledge system and seek knowledge innovation by continuously responding to the practical needs of educational reform in China. Comparative education needs to establish its own disciplinary norms and strengthen the study of foundational theories and the training of research methods for comparative education researchers.更多还原