【摘要】 黄叔琳对《史通》的注释，由其个人“补注”和所录王惟俭《史通》注释两部分组成。在其个人“补注”部分，黄叔琳进行了注人、注书、注字词名物、注历史典故诸方面的工作，是补加王惟俭所未注者，具有多重价值。其所录王惟俭《史通》注释，并非是对王惟俭注释的直接移录，而是对其进行了补充、节略、修改、删除、加入新注和移动位置等方面的处理，经他整理之后的注释，成效明显高于王氏原注，确实做到了青出于蓝胜于蓝，并很大程度地代表了他个人注释《史通》的成就。而比较黄叔琳与郭孔延、浦起龙的注释可知，三者各有优劣，可相互补充，但不可互相替代，它们都是《史通》注释不断发展中的重要环节。因此黄叔琳《史通》注释虽然重在对王惟俭注释的删繁补遗，但也非常值得关注。更多还原

【Abstract】 Huang Shulin’s annotation of SHITONG is composed of his supplementary annotation and Wang Weijian’s annotation. In his supplementary annotation, Huang Shulin annotated personages, books, words and historical allusions, was supplement of Wang Weijian’s, so Huang’s work is valuable. Huang Shulin didn’t simply accepted Wang Weijian’s annotation, but improved it, for he supplemented, abridged, modified, deleting, added new annotations and rewrote on original one. His annotation is obviously better than Wang Weijian’s, representing his personal achievements. By comparing Huang Shulin’s annotation on SHITONG with those of Guo Kongyan and Pu Qilong, we can learn that each of them has own advantages. They could supplementary to each other, but couldn’t replace each other. Therefore, though Huang Shulin’s annotation of SHITONG is deletion and supplement to Wang Weijian’s annotations, it was valuable.更多还原