节点文献

十二导联心电图的起始激动速度和终末激动速度在宽QRS心动过速鉴别诊断中的价值研究

Study on value of initial and teiminal ventricular activation velocity of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in differential diagnosis of wide QRS-complex tachycardia

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张凌志余凌祺王云鹤张祖文刘强蒋汝红孙雅逊于路张培陈世权盛夏蒋晨阳

【Author】 ZHANG Ling-zhi;YU Ling-qi;WANG Yun-he;ZHANG Zu-wen;LIU Qiang;JIANG Ru-hong;SUN Ya-xun;YU Lu;ZHANG Pei;CHEN Shi-quan;SHENG Xia;JIANG Chen-yang;Department of Cardiology,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,College of Medicine,Zhejiang University;

【通讯作者】 蒋晨阳;

【机构】 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院心血管内科温岭市第一人民医院心电图室

【摘要】 目的 分析宽QRS心动过速(WCT)各导联的起始激动速度(Vi)、终末激动速度(Vt)及Vi/Vt值,探讨其在WCT鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2011年11月至2020年6月在浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院经12导联常规心电图诊断为WCT的患者100例[其中室性心动过速(VT)70例,室上性心动过速(SVT)30例]。测量WCT各导联Vi和Vt,计算Vi/Vt,绘制ROC曲线,比较其鉴别诊断WCT的效能。结果 就Vi而言,在I、avR及胸V1-V6导联SVT均快于VT(P<0.05);肢体导联及胸V4-V6导联,SVT的Vt均慢于VT(P<0.05);各导联(除了V1导联)SVT的Vi/Vt值均大于VT(P<0.05)。通过ROC曲线分析,avR及V5导联有最大且相似的曲线下面积(AUC),分别为0.85(0.76~0.91)和0.86(0.77~0.92),最佳临界值均为1.75。结合导联QRS时限,QRS时限介于120~159 ms时,avR及V5导联的AUC最高,当avR及V5导联QRS时限<120 ms时,最佳临界值明显提高。结论 avR导联及V5导联Vi/Vt比值较其余导联在WCT鉴别诊断中更有价值,但其最佳临界值可能并不是1,同时对于不同导联不同QRS时限,设置合适的Vi/Vt临界值可能有助于提升WCT鉴别诊断的效能。

【Abstract】 Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the value of the initial (Vi) and teiminal (Vt) ventricular activation velocity and ratio of them (Vi/Vt) of every electrocardiographic(ECG)leads in the differential diagnosis of Wide QRS-complex Tachycardia(WCT). Methods 100 WCTs[including 70 cases of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 30cases of supraventricular tachycardia(SVT)] from 100 patients with proven diagnoses at the Run Run Shaw Hospital from November 2011 to June 2020 were analyzed. Vi and Vt of every ECG leads of the WCTs were measured,Vi/Vt were calculated,and ROC curves were drawn to compare the efficacy of these indicators in differential diagnosis of WCT. Results In terms of Vi,SVTs were faster than VTs in I,avR and V1-V6 leads(P < 0.05). Vt of SVTs were slower than that of VTs in limb and V4-V6 leads(P < 0.01). The Vi/Vt value of SVTs in most ECG leads,except lead V1,were higher than that of VTs(P < 0.05). According to ROC curve analysis,lead avR and V5 had the largest and similar area under the curve(AUC)of 0.85(0.76-0.91) and 0.86(0.77-0.92),respectively,and the optimal critical value was 1.75 for both. Combined with QRS duration,the AUC were the highest when the QRS duration of the avR and V5 leads were between 120-159 ms,and the optimal cutoff value of them may not be 1,and for different QRS and different ECG leads,setting a suitable Vi/Vt critecal value may help to improve the performance of WCT differential diagnosis.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(8237020221);温岭市科学技术局项目(2020SO180084)
  • 【文献出处】 中国实用内科杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年11期
  • 【分类号】R541.71
  • 【下载频次】4
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络