【摘要】 嵇康为司马昭所杀，嵇绍却在山涛的帮助下仕宦西晋，并在荡阴之战中以臣节死难。嵇绍背父出仕与忠君死节的行为给史家评价嵇绍带来了争议。东晋王隐编撰的《晋书》和唐代房玄龄等人编修的《晋书》分别取其出仕与死节之事来评价嵇绍，并对嵇绍事迹做不同程度的“曲笔”，最终得出了两种截然不同的评价。两本《晋书》的评价差异反映了史书编撰理念与皇权强弱、社会风尚,以及史书编撰制度的密切关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 Ji Kang was killed by Sima Zhao. Under these circumstances, Ji Shao became an official in the Western Jin Dynasty, aided by Shan Tao, and perished while upholding the moral integrity of his position during the War of Dang Yin. His behavior, involving betrayal of his father and loyalty to the emperor, has sparked controversy among historians when assessing Ji Shao. Jin Shu, compiled by Wang Yin of the Eastern Jin Dynasty and Fang Xuanling of the Tang Dynasty, took into account his experiences as an official and his death defending the emperor when evaluating Ji Shao. The two versions of Jin Shu regarding Ji Shao’s deeds vary in terms of accuracy, ultimately leading to two significantly different evaluations. The varying evaluations in the two versions of Jin Shu reflect the fact that the compilation of official history is intimately tied to the strength of the emperor’s power, social custom, and the system for the production of historical books.更多还原