【摘要】 国际民事诉讼法和民事诉讼法的关系一直是国际私法学界关注的焦点问题之一，存在着不同的理解和认识。特别是认为国际民事诉讼法是民事诉讼法的特别规定和国际民事诉讼法是独立于民事诉讼法的单独的法律部门这两种观点最为典型。2023年新修正的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第270条承袭了之前的制度内容，依旧采取特别规定说。国际私法学界虽然原则上多采取独立说，但在具体制度的适用上又倾向特别规定说，其根源是混淆了国际民事诉讼法的调整对象与调整事项。虽然国际民事诉讼法规则与民事诉讼法规则均适用于涉外民事案件，但它们解决的是不同的法律问题。国际民事诉讼法解决的是涉外民事案件独有的程序问题、程序法上的法律适用问题、需特殊处理的程序问题，其制度内容秉承国际主义(普遍主义)理念，即以经济、公平、及时、便捷地解决当事人之间的纠纷，进而维护涉外民事法律关系的稳定，保护当事人的正当利益和期待，促进国际民商事交往为宗旨。鉴于此，采取独立说更有利于妥善处理涉外民事案件，拓展国际民事诉讼法的发展空间。因此，在国际民事诉讼法对本应属于其调整的问题没有明文规定时，并不应适用民事诉讼法，而应按照国际主义精神发现应有的制度内容。更多还原

【Abstract】 The relationship between International Civil Procedure Law and Civil Procedure Law has always been a matter of concern on which there are different understandings.Thereinto, the two most typical viewpoints are respectively that the former is the special provision of the latter and that the former is an independent legal department.Article 270 of the newly amended Civil Procedure Law inherits the previous system content still adopting the theory of the former being the later. This article holds that although both are applicable to civil cases involving foreign elements, they solve different legal problems. International Civil Procedure Law deals with the unique problems of foreign-related civil cases, the problems of law application in procedural law, and the problems that need special treatment, and adheres to the concept of internationalism(universalism). To adopt the theory of International Civil Procedure Law as an independent legal department is more conducive to properly handling foreign-related civil cases and expanding the development space of International Civil Procedure Law. Therefore, in the absence of explicit provisions in International Civil Procedure Law, it is wise to find out the due system content in accordance with the spirit of internationalism, but not to apply the rules of Civil Procedure Law.更多还原