节点文献

单边经济制裁对国际商事仲裁的影响及其国际解决方案

International Solutions to Curb the Impact of Unilateral Economic Sanctions on International Commercial Arbitration

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 霍政欣; 陈静;

【Author】 Huo Zhengxin;Chen Jing;

【机构】 中国政法大学国际法学院;

【摘要】 国际商事仲裁实践表明,单边经济制裁的广泛运用直接影响了国际商事合同的履行,引发了大量国际商事争议,显著增加了仲裁协议效力、法律适用、仲裁程序推进以及裁决的承认和执行等事项的不确定性。国际商事仲裁制度尊重当事人意思自治、快捷高效、独立公正、裁决易于执行等优势正在遭受侵蚀。单边经济制裁天然具有国际性,仅依靠国家层面的自我克制或国内立法无法从根本上减少其对国际商事仲裁制度产生的影响,现行国际商事仲裁立法也缺乏针对性措施。鉴于此,有必要推动国际社会加强合作,尽快启动国际立法,针对单边经济制裁对国际商事仲裁制度的冲击提出国际解决方案。从当前国际立法实践来看,促请联合国国际贸易法委员会牵头,就减小单边经济制裁对国际商事仲裁制度的影响问题启动国际立法是可行路径。中国率先提出启动相关国际立法方案,有利于提升中国的国际话语权和提供国际公共产品的能力,也是践行真正的多边主义和推进构建人类命运共同体理念的重要实践。

【Abstract】 The practice of international commercial arbitration has shown that, widespread use of unilateral economic sanctions directly affects the performance of international commercial contracts, triggers a large number of international commercial disputes, and also gives rise to greater uncertainty on the validity of arbitration agreement, application of the law, carrying out of arbitration proceedings, and matters such as the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. The inherent advantages of the international commercial arbitration system, such as showing full respect for party autonomy, high efficiency, independence and impartiality, and enforceability of arbitral awards, have been eroded. Unilateral economic sanctions are, by nature, international. Relying solely on national self-restraint and domestic legislation cannot fundamentally reduce the sanctions impact on the international commercial arbitration system. Currently, the international commercial arbitration legislation also lacks targeted measures. In view of this, it is necessary to promote enhanced cooperation among the international community and initiate international legislation to reduce the negative impact of unilateral economic sanctions on the international commercial arbitration system. From the perspective of current international legislative practices, it is a feasible way to suggest the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law(UNCITRAL) to take the lead in initiating international legislation. The Chinese approach of initiating relevant international legislation is conducive to enhancing its international discourse and its capacity to provide international public goods. It is also a crucial practice in upholding genuine multilateralism and promoting the concept of building a community with a shared future for mankind.

【基金】 国家社科基金重点项目“《反外国制裁法》的司法适用问题研究”(项目编号:23AFX024)的阶段性研究成果
  • 【文献出处】 国际法研究 ,Chinese Review of International Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年01期
  • 【分类号】D997.4
  • 【下载频次】347
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络