【摘要】 随着新文科建设的推进，计算法学正成为近年来炙手可热的新兴学科和研究范式。中国计算法学现今的问题是：对计算法学之发展脉络，尤其是在学科的研究范畴和发展路径上没有形成一致的认识。文章通过使用多种统计学方法和研究工具，系统地梳理、分析和对比全球近二十年的计算法学研究的相关文献，重现了从21世纪初至近年国内外计算法学研究阶段、科研合作、研究主题和知识结构的演进过程和差异。与国外相比，中国计算法学在不同研究范畴上可能走向分化。倡导问题导向的计算法学研究有利于梳理不同研究路径的关系，促进学科的有序发展。学界需要尝试在问题意识、研究能力和研究方法的不同维度上整合计算法学的研究路径，探索计算法学发展的中国道路。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the advancement of “the new liberal arts”, computational jurisprudence is becoming a heated interdisciplinary subject and research paradigm in recent years. The current problem with computational jurisprudence in China is that there is no consensus on the “computation” of computational jurisprudence, especially in terms of the research scope and the development path of the discipline. Utilizing various statistical methods and research tools, this paper systematically collates, analyzes, and compares relevant literature on computational jurisprudence worldwide in the last two decades, and reproduces the evolution and differences in relevant research stages, research collaborations, research themes, and knowledge structures at home and abroad from the early 21st century to the present. Compared with foreign countries, Chinese computational jurisprudence may head toward a division in multiple subdivided research categories. Advocating problem-oriented computational jurisprudence research in computational law is conducive to the collating of the relationships between different research paths and the promoting of the orderly development of the discipline. It is imperative for the academic community to actively foster the integration of research paths within computational jurisprudence across multiple dimensions, including issue awareness, research capability, and research methods. This collaborative effort will facilitate the exploration of a promising future development path for Chinese computational jurisprudence.更多还原