【摘要】 本研究主要运用内容分析法，对11本体育类核心期刊中的5842篇论文的一致性进行研究。结果表明，在整体样本中，一致性存在极其显著性差异（P <0.01）；在不同期刊、不同年代、不同栏目的非参数检验中，配对样本的一致性均存在极其显著性差异（P <0.01），在不同期刊、不同年代的单个非参数检验中，配对样本的一致性均存在极其显著性差异（P <0.01）；在交叉表中，一致性在不同期刊、不同年代、不同栏目上均存在极其显著性差异（P <0.01），在单个交叉表中，一致性在不同年代、不同期刊上表现出了多种差异性（P <0.01,P <0.05,P> 0.05）。研究得出结论：不同期刊均存在一定的一致性，但总体而言，这种“关系”效应不具有统计学意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 This study mainly uses the content analysis method to research the consistency of 5842 papers in 11 core sports journals. The results show that in the overall sample, there is an extremely significant difference in consistency(P < 0.01). In the non-parametric tests of different journals, different years, and different columns, the consistency of paired samples all shows an extremely significant difference(P < 0.01). In the single non-parametric tests of different journals and different years, the consistency of paired samples also shows an extremely significant difference(P < 0.01).In the cross-tabulation, the consistency shows an extremely significant difference in different journals, different years,and different columns(P < 0.01). In the single cross-tabulation, the consistency shows various differences in different years and different journals(P < 0.01, P < 0.05, P > 0.05). The study concludes that there is a certain consistency in different journals, but overall, this “relationship” effect has no statistical significance.更多还原