【摘要】 道路交通信号作为道路交通执法的常用手段，直接关系着交通执法的法治化以及道路使用人的权利保障，由此引发的纠纷也不在少数，其中，最为主要的问题在于道路交通信号的法律性质的界定。对此，应当采取类型化的方式进行处理。就道路交通信号的法律性质，对于其中不具有拘束力的指令性和警示性信号，可以将其界定为行政事实行为范畴；对于具有规范意义的禁令性和遵循性信号，由于其针对的相对人和事项不是特定的。因此，可以将其界定为抽象行政行为。而从道路交通信号的设置主体——基层执法的交警部门来看，禁令性和遵循性信号在性质上等同于规范性文件。但这样的界定也面临着规范性文件制定程序、形式，以及法律保留原则的考验，对此，可以从行政执法的便宜性和法律规范的重述角度化解难题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Road traffic signals, as a common means of road traffic law enforcement, are directly related to the rule of law in traffic law enforcement and the protection of the rights of road users. Road traffic signals have given rise to a number of disputes, the most important of which lies in the definition of the legal nature of road traffic signals.In this regard, a typological approach should be adopted. The non-binding directive and warning road traffic signals can be defined as an administrative factual act; the normative prohibitive and mandatory signals can be defined as an abstract administrative act because its target individuals and matters are not specific. From the point of view of the main body of road traffic signals-grassroots law enforcement traffic police department, prohibitive and mandatory signals are equivalent in nature to normative documents. However, such a definition is also confronted with the test of the procedure for the formulation of normative documents, their forms and the principle of legal reservation. In this regard, the difficulties can be resolved in terms of the convenience of administrative enforcement and the restatement of legal norms.更多还原