节点文献

耕作方式与秸秆还田对土壤有机碳及颗粒有机碳的影响

Effects of Tillage Methods and Straw Returning to Field on Soil Organic Carbon and Particulate Organic Carbon

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨乾王秋红沈莹赵红香刘振宁堂原

【Author】 YANG Qian;WANG Qiuhong;SHEN Ying;ZHAO Hongxiang;LIU Zhen;NING Tangyuan;College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Water Physiology and Drought-resistant Germplasm Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture;Feicheng Modern Agriculture Development Service Center;

【通讯作者】 刘振;

【机构】 山东农业大学农学院,农业农村部作物水分生理与抗旱种质改良重点实验室肥城市现代农业发展服务中心

【摘要】 为探讨不同耕作方式与秸秆管理措施相结合对土壤固碳及碳组分的影响,设置深松秸秆还田(STs)、深松秸秆不还田(ST0)、旋耕秸秆还田(RTs)、旋耕秸秆不还田(RT0)4个处理,考察土壤容重、有机碳含量和颗粒有机碳含量。结果表明:深松处理土壤有机碳储量比旋耕处理增加了10.69%,颗粒有机碳含量增加了41.47%;秸秆还田处理土壤有机碳储量比秸秆不还田处理增加了27.14%,颗粒有机碳含量增加了17.92%。深松结合秸秆还田有利于土壤有机碳固存。

【Abstract】 In order to explore the effects of different tillage methods and straw management measures on soil carbon sequestration and carbon components, four treatments including subsoiling with straw returning(STs), subsoiling without straw returning(ST0), rotary tillage with straw returning(RTs), rotary tillage without straw returning(RT0) were set to investigate the soil capacity, organic carbon content and particle organic carbon content. The results showed that soil organic carbon storage and particulate organic carbon under subsoiling treatment increased by 10.69% and 41.47% compared with the rotary tillage; The soil organic carbon storage and particulate organic carbon under straw returning treatment increased by 27.14% and 17.92% compared without straw returning. The subsoiling combined with straw returning to field was beneficial to soil organic carbon sequestration.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(32472245);山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2021CXGC010804-05-01)
  • 【文献出处】 农业科技与装备 ,Agricultural Science & Technology and Equipment , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年05期
  • 【分类号】S153.6;S141.4
  • 【下载频次】79
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络