节点文献
视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿抗炎和抗VEGF治疗后SD-OCT生物标志物的观察
Observation of SD-OCT biomarkers after anti-inflammatory and anti-VEGF treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
【摘要】 目的 评估视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)抗炎和抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗后患者视功能和频域相干光层析成像术(SD-OCT)生物标志物的变化,为临床选择合适的治疗方案提供依据。方法 前瞻性病例研究。2019年6月至2021年11月在菏泽医学专科学校附属医院确诊的RVO-ME患者106例(106只眼),随机分为A、B两组,其中A组给予玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗治疗,B组给予玻璃体腔内注射地塞米松玻璃体腔内植入剂治疗。在基线和首次治疗后12个月记录最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、SD-OCT的生物标志物和不良反应,比较两组在治疗前后BCVA、 SD-OCT的变化和不良反应的发生率。结果 两组患者治疗后BCVA、SD-OCT生物标志物均显著改善(均P <0.01),在12个月时B组患者浆液性视网膜脱离(SRD)降度改善明显优于A组,治疗后B组患者视网膜内高反射灶(HRFs)数量明显少于A组。两组比较,外界膜(ELM)、椭圆体带(EZ)、视网膜内层结构紊乱(DRIL)的变化差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0.05)。两组治疗后球结膜下出血、晶状体混浊的发生率差异均无统计学意义,但B组24例患者出现眼压升高,明显高于A组。结论 抗炎和抗VEGF治疗对RVO-ME均有效,BCVA和SD-OCT生物标志物均有改善,在改善SRD方面,抗炎治疗优于抗VEGF治疗,在HRFs的数量上,抗炎和抗VEGF治疗之间没有差异。
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the changes in visual function and spectral domain optical coherence tomogra-phy(SD-OCT) biomarkers in patients with retinal vein obstruction secondary macular edema(RVO-ME) after antiinflammatory and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) treatment, and to provide evidence for clinical selection of appropriate treatment. Methods For prospective study, 106 patients(106 eyes) diagnosed with RVO-ME in the Affili-ated Hospital of Heze Medical College from June 2019 to November 2021 were randomly divided into two groups: A and B.Group A was given intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab, group B was given intravitreal injection of dexamethasone. Bio-markers of best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and SD-OCT and adverse reactions were recorded at baseline and 12mo af-ter the first treatment, and changes in BCVA and SD-OCT and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results BCVA and SD-OCT biomarkers were significantly improved in both groups after treatment(P < 0.01). Serous retinal detachment(SRD) degradation in group B was significantly better than that in group A at 12mo, and the number of hyperreflective retinal foci(HRFs) in group B was significantly less than that in group A after the treatment. Compared with the two groups, there was no statistical significance in the changes of external retinal membrane(ELM), ellipsoid zone(EZ) and thedisorganization of retinal innerlayers(DRIL)(P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage and lens opacity between the two groups after treatment, but 10 patients in group B showed increased intraocular pressure(IOP), which was significantly higher than that in group A.Conclusions Both anti-inflammatory and anti-VEGF treatment were effective for RVO-ME, BCVA and SD-OCT biomarkers were improved, anti-inflammatory treatment was superior to anti-VEGF treatment in improving SRD, and there was no difference between anti-inflammatory and anti-VEGF treatment in the number of HRFs.
【Key words】 Macular edema; Spectral domain optical coherence tomography; Biomarkers; Anti-inflammatory therapy; Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy;
- 【文献出处】 临床眼科杂志 ,Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年06期
- 【分类号】R774.5
- 【下载频次】33