【摘要】 就日常生活社会学的视角而言，芝加哥学派的城市社会学理论缺乏明确的阶级观点；新城市社会学虽强调了空间与阶级的关联，但缺乏具体的改变路径。现有的城市社会学理论对于日常生活的关注不够，对于城市问题的解决方案较少且无力；而人民城市理论则强调了城市发展与治理的人民性，突出了“人民的美好生活”这一重要目标。引入日常生活社会学的视角可以更好地透视人民城市的日常生活面向。人民城市建设要服务于人民的美好生活向往，连接生活与可能，压缩日常生活与社会结构之间的差距。空间、时间与关系是观察人民城市的三个核心概念，其内涵是空间维度的正义性与包容性、时间维度中生活节奏的匹配性、关系维度的平等性和交互性。结合各地人民城市建设的创新实践，可以辨识出人民城市建设的三个支柱，即宜居的邻近、包容的发展和适度的治理。更多还原

【Abstract】 From the perspective of the sociology of everyday life, the urban sociological theories of the Chicago School lack a clear view of class; the new urban sociology emphasizes the connection between space and class, but lacks a specific path for change. Existing urban sociological theories do not pay enough attention to everyday life, and offer few and weak solutions to urban problems,while the People’s City Theory emphasizes the people’s nature of urban development and governance,highlighting the important goal of “a better life for the people”. The introduction of the perspective of sociology of everyday life can provide a better perspective on the everyday life of the people’s city. The construction of the people’s city has to serve the people’s aspirations for a better life, connect the life with the possibilities, and narrow the gap between everyday life and the possibility of social structure.Space, time and relationship are the three core concepts in observing the people’s city, which connote justice and inclusiveness in the spatial dimension, matching of life rhythms in the time dimension, and equality and interactivity in the relationship dimension. Combined with the innovative practices of people’s city construction in different places, three pillars of people’s city construction can be identified: livable neighborhoods, inclusive development and appropriate governance.更多还原