【摘要】 偏重哲学话语的理论争议无益于解决刑事证明标准的适用难题。在法典化改革的进程中，有必要厘清刑事证明标准条款自身的逻辑性和层次性，进而对现有法律文本的表述进行适当的调整和修改，明确证据收集的程序合法标准，明确证据查证属实的法定义务，确立定罪事实排除合理怀疑的程序规则，以实现发现案件真相和保障法官自由裁量权行使之间的价值平衡，最终实现刑事证明标准在程序规范下的合理适用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Engaging in theoretical debates predominantly rooted in philosophical discourse does little to address the challenges associated with the application of standards for criminal proof. Amid the ongoing process of legal codification reform, it becomes imperative to elucidate the inherent logic and hierarchical structure of the clauses governing criminal proof standards. Consequently, adjustments and modifications to the current legal language are necessary. It is paramount to define the lawful standards guiding the collection of evidence, specify the legal obligations pertaining to the verification of evidence authenticity, and institute procedural rules that eliminate reasonable doubt in establishing the facts of guilt. This endeavor seeks to strike a balance between uncovering the truth in a case and safeguarding the exercise of judicial discretion. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure the judicious and rational application of criminal proof standards within the framework of procedural norms.更多还原