【摘要】 以布莱恩·哈利为代表的学者开启地图“知识—权力”议题以来，相关研究日渐丰富，相较于从原始地图及编绘者视角入手的研究，对于从地图传播过程中广义地图使用者(读者)视角的考察较少。论文以一张号称“1910年”由“德国”绘制的青岛城市规划地图为案例，借助地理配准、图纸内容对比分析等手段，尝试解译地图表征背后隐藏的规划史实。结果表明：地图使用者通过无意识或有意识的地图复制和重组等参与行为，造成了地图表征失真，并通过权威教科书的广泛传播形成了颠覆原图认知的全新规划“史实”。文章进一步讨论了地图使用者在参与过程中作为特定社会阶层潜在的价值观和意识形态与地图表征之间的关联。希冀从地图使用者视角来完善布莱恩·哈利的地图权力相关议题，并以城市规划地图这一特定地图类型丰富地图(学)史的案例研究。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the advent of scholarship initiated by John Brian Haley on the nexus between map and "knowledge-power", research in this domain has proliferated significantly. Nevertheless, extant studies predominantly emphasize the perspective of the original map creators, neglecting an examination of the map dissemination process from the perspective of the general map user. Utilizing the city planning map of Qingdao,purportedly crafted by German in 1910, as a case study, this study employed georeferencing techniques and a comparative analysis of map contents to elucidate the underlying urban planning truth and the historical intricacies hidden behind the map’s representation. The results indicate that in the 1950s, some specific map users, who were also specialized urban and rural planning scholars, replicated and reconfigured a contemporary city map produced by German in 1910 and an urban planning map created by Japanese in 1915, resulting in the generation of an entirely new map. Consequently, this distorted map representation has engendered a totally new "historical reality" that subverts people’s cognition and challenges the initial map interpretation, facilitated by the extensive propagation of authoritative textbooks. The interplay between the inherent values and ideologies of a specific social class as map users and the map representation in their participation process was further discussed.In essence, this study augmented and nuanced Haley’s discourse on map power from the perspective of map users, while also contributing a novel dimension to the cartographic historical analysis, specifically focusing on urban planning maps.更多还原