【摘要】 文章以地方志关于扁鹊墓葬的记载为依据，对全国十处扁鹊墓葬考察，发现大部分方志编纂者对当地的扁鹊墓的真伪进行了考辨，但其结论却不尽相同。根据历史与逻辑原则来判断，各地扁鹊墓的存在必然是有原因的。通过梳理扁鹊学派的提出和完善过程，笔者认为扁鹊为学派名称这一结论是毋庸置疑的。但方志编纂者却仅将扁鹊作为一人看待，没有认识到“扁鹊”为学派名称，故才会有如此多的真假辨析。因此可以推测，在不同历史时期，不同地区均有医者借扁鹊名号行医，所以才会有如此多的扁鹊墓。这进一步论证了“扁鹊”为学派名称，而非单指秦越人一人。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper examines ten BIAN Que tombs across the country on the basis of local records on magpie tombs,and finds that most compilers of square records have examined the authenticity of local magpie tombs, but their conclusions are not the same. Judging from the principles of history and logic, there must be a reason for the existence of BIAN Que tombs in various places. By combing through the process of proposing and perfecting the BIAN Que school, we believe that the conclusion that BIAN Que was the name of the school is indisputable. However, the compilers of chorography only regarded BIAN Que as a person and did not recognise BIAN Que as the name of the school, which is why there are so many analyses of truth and falsehood. Therefore, we can speculate that in different historical periods, there were doctors who practised medicine under the banner of BIAN Que in different regions, which is why there are so many BIAN Que tombs. This further proves that BIAN Que is the name of a school of medicine, and does not refer to the QIN Yue ren alone.更多还原