【摘要】 为了提高撤稿论文的引用著录规范性，采用比较分析法，对目前期刊中出现的著录格式、行业协会给出的著录格式、期刊官方网站推荐的著录格式进行了比较与分析。结果表明：目前期刊中撤稿论文的著录比较混乱，主要表现在没有标出论文的撤稿状态、文后著录格式不统一；行业协会给出的格式均含有撤稿相关的标识词，著录内容相对全面，既有撤稿论文的著录信息，也有撤稿声明的相关信息，但是比较复杂、烦琐；期刊的官方网站有的提供的著录格式中带有撤稿标识词，有的没有提供撤稿标识词，与普通论文的著录格式一样。引用撤稿论文应做到知情引用、规范著录。建议尽快制订撤稿论文的引用著录标准或者指南，增加撤稿论文的著录示例，以便作者与编辑遵照执行，规范引用著录撤稿论文。更多还原

【Abstract】 In order to enhance the normativity of citation and recording of retracted papers,a comparative analysis method was utilized to examine the current recording formats in journals,the formats provided by industry organizations,and the formats recommended by official journal websites.The results indicate that the recording of retracted papers in journals is currently in a state of disarray,primarily characterized by the omission of the paper’s retracted status and the lack of uniformity in the reference format.The formats offered by industry associations all include identifiers related to the retraction,providing a relatively comprehensive record that encompasses both the citation information of the retracted paper and the details of the retraction notice.However,these formats are complex and cumbersome.Some official journal websites provide reference formats that include retraction identifiers,while others do not,making them identical to the formats used for regular papers.The citation of retracted papers should be done with awareness and standardization.It is recommended that standards or guidelines for the citation and recording of retracted papers be established as soon as possible,with additional citation examples of retracted papers to guide authors and editors in the standardized citation and recording of such papers.更多还原