【摘要】 汉语学界多年前就开始对谐音结构中的“谐体”和“本体”加以界定和区分。尽管前述概念早已用开，但论及何谓谐体何谓本体始终是各说各话。目前流行的代表性观点主要有三种，而无论着眼于谐音生成的起与讫，还是着眼于形式表现的常与变，还是着眼于语义层次的内与外，均无法保证这三种观点无往不利。文章通过同比喻和借代相关概念的比较，亦即通过同喻体和本体、代体和本体的比较，以及基于术语系统对称性和整齐性的考量，提出将对应于手段还是对应于目的作为区分谐体和本体根据的新观点，并对此作了充分验证。科学界定和正确区分谐体和本体，对谐音构成机理的探究、谐音研究的学术交流、谐音译注的理解领会、语文教学的顺利开展及语文词典的规范编纂，都有着重要的学术价值和实践指导意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 Chinese linguistic studies have attempted to define and distinguish the concepts of “harmonized form” and “original form” within homophonic structures.Despite the longstanding use of these concepts, the debates persist regarding their exact definitions.Currently, there are three representative viewpoints regarding their definition and differentiation, but none of them can claim absolute superiority, whether focusing on the inception and termination of homophony, the constancy and variability of formal expression, or the internal and external semantic levels.By comparing these concepts with those of metaphor and metonymy, namely through comparing them with vehicle and tenor, as well as through consideration based on the symmetry and neatness of terminological systems, a new viewpoint is proposed which distinguishes between harmonized form and original form based on correspondence to means or to ends, this proposition is rigorously verified.Scientifically defining and distinguishing between harmonized form and original form holds academic and practical significance, whether for investigating the mechanism of homophony formation, academic exchange in homophonic studies, comprehension of homophonic annotations, smooth conduct of language teaching, or standardized compilation of language dictionaries.更多还原