【摘要】 《立法法》等将宪法精神确定为独立的合宪性审查标准。在该语境下,“宪法精神”的内涵产生了明显的变化,同时,从外延上看,宪法精神与宪法规定、原则既关联又独立。既有合宪性审查实践表明,宪法精神具有独立适用的空间,但不具有次序上的优先性;宪法精神与宪法规定、原则出现在同一审查活动时,形成三重适用关系。在合宪性审查理论与实践不断完善的基础上,应当围绕宪法精神作为合宪性审查标准的确定与适用主体、形式、适用空间、判断框架等形成相对明确的规则。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Legislation Law and other norms regard constitutional ethos as an independent criterion for constitutional review. Under the context, the connotation of “constitutional ethos ” has undergone a significant change; meanwhile, from the perspective of extension, constitutional ethos is related to and independent of constitutional provisions and principles. The existing practice of constitutional review shows that constitutional ethos has been provided space for independent application, but it does not have priority in order. When the ethos, provisions and principles of the constitution appear in the same review activity, it forms a threefold relationship. On the basis of the continuous improvement of the theory and practice of constitutional review, relatively clear rules should be formed around the subject, form, applicable space and judging framework for the identification and application of constitutional ethos when it act as the constitutional review criterion.更多还原