【摘要】 知识产权法与反不正当竞争法在逻辑关系上，不是特别法与普通法的关系，并不相互排斥，可以平行适用。反不正当竞争法具有独立性，并不附属于和依赖于知识产权法，人为划分适用上的优先与劣后次序，在学理上经不起解释，在立法上也是没有依据的。不同法律之间存在某种制衡与约束关系，竞争法在一定程度和意义上就是用来“抵触”知识产权法的。法律竞合并不全然是排斥性的，反不正当竞争法与知识产权法的适用不能简单对立、非此即彼。反不正当竞争法具有与生俱来的谦抑性，在有些情况下，按照反不正当竞争法调整社会关系有其优越性。更多还原

【Abstract】 The logical relationship between intellectual property(IP) law and anti-unfair competition law is not that of lex specialis vis-à-vis lex generalis. They are not mutually exclusive but parallelly applicable. The anti-unfair competition law is an independent area of law, rather than affiliated to or dependent on IP law. Thus, there is neither theoretical nor statutory basis to mandate one to apply IP law before applying anti-unfair competition law. There is certain check and balance between different areas of law, and to some extent, competition law is designed to "contradict" IP law. The coexistence of laws does not always mean mutual exclusivity of these laws. Anti-unfair competition law and IP law are not simply opposed to each other. Anti-unfair competition law is inherently modest and restrained, and in some circumstances, it could be advantageous to regulate social relations by this law.更多还原