【摘要】 现阶段学界关于行政公益诉讼举证责任分配的争议焦点主要集中于原告与被告举证能力是否对等、两种不同诉讼举证责任分配原则是否应当区别、检察机关在行政公益诉讼中的权能作用等问题。由检察机关提起行政公益诉讼是符合我国国家机构职能分工和体制构架的合理制度设计，但是与传统行政诉讼相比，行政公益诉讼具备独特的诉讼属性，举证责任也不应一概而论。科学合理确定诉讼双方的举证责任，对于这项制度合理健康运行来说必不可少。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, the focus of the disputes in academic circles on the allocation of the burden of proof in administrative public interest litigation mainly focuses on whether the plaintiff and defendant’s ability to present evidence is equal, whether the two different principles of allocation of burden of proof in different litigation should be differentiated, and the power and role of procuratorial organs in administrative public interest litigation. Whether government departments or social organizations initiate administrative public interest lawsuits, the burden of proof is very important, and the principles of limited ability to present evidence and credible and available evidence must be followed. This paper elaborates on legislative and judicial issues, and discusses the principle of allocation of the burden of proof in the current administrative public interest litigation system.更多还原