【摘要】 为了解决公众参与地理信息系统(Public Participation in GIS,简称PPGIS)在生态系统服务(Ecosystem Services, ES)应用中，复杂空间分析/统计成为目标的情况下，其时间、成本和管理工作代价高昂的问题。研究设计提供一种增强的分析框架，以适应复杂的地理空间分析技术。基于此，选取普达措国家公园作为研究区域进行展示；然后对参与了参与式纸质地图制图的旅客进行访问，并使用颜色标记手绘(作为多边形)与不同类别ES相关的自我感知区域；最后通过收集二维数据，同时利用普通最小二乘法、地理加权回归和Moran’s I等空间分析方法，评估了ES在整个景观中的空间自相关性。此外，除了参与式映射外，受访者还参与完成了一份半结构化的问卷，并使用主成分分析和层次聚类进行了分析，由此揭示了人们对不同ES重要性感知结构的差异性。结果表明，首先供给服务最受重视，其次是调节、支持和文化服务。其中，在调节和支持服务方面，二者的升值模式比较相似，而文化服务最不受信任，即其与政府指定的生态旅游和普达措国家公园的历史功能大相径庭。并且研究发现，社区对公园的非物质利益的重视程度并不高。在地理上，除文化服务外，大多数ES基本上覆盖了整个普达措国家公园，而国家公园的核心区域在提供和调节服务之间重叠最多。由此揭示的空间协同作用可以确定提取和非提取用途之间潜在冲突可能发生的区域，为普达措国家公园和其他保护区的可持续管理提供参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 To address the costly time, cost, and management effort of Public Participation in GIS(PPGIS)in Ecosystem Services(ES)applications where complex spatial analysis/statistics are the goal.The study is designed to provide an enhanced analytical framework to accommodate complex geospatial analysis techniques.Based on this, the study selected Potatso National Park as the study area for presentation; then interviewed travelers who participated in participatory paper mapping and used color markers to hand-draw(as polygons)self-perceived areas associated with different categories of ES;finally, by collecting two-dimensional data while using Ordinary least squares(OLS)Geographically weighted regression(GWR)and Moran’s I were used to assess the spatial autocorrelation of ES across the landscape.In addition, in addition to participatory mapping, respondents participated in completing a semi-structured questionnaire that was analyzed using principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering, which revealed differences in the structure of perceived importance of different ESs.The results of the study showed that firstly supply services were most valued, followed by regulation, support and cultural services.Among them, the two have relatively similar patterns of appreciation in terms of regulating and supporting services, while cultural services are the least trusted, i.e.,their historical functions are quite different from those of the government-designated ecotourism and Potatso National Park.And the study found that communities do not place a high value on the non-material benefits of the park.Geographically, most ES largely covered the entire Potatso National Park, with the exception of cultural services, while the core areas of the national park had the most overlap between service provision and regulation.The resulting revealed spatial synergies can identify areas where potential conflicts between extractive and non-extractive uses may occur, informing the sustainable management of Potatso National Park and other protected areas.更多还原