【摘要】 国内期刊发表了海量以“某视域下的某研究”为题的学术论文，但鲜有研究者对“视域”进行界定和说明。“视域”与“视阈”是异形词，现前者为规范用词，表视野义时跟“视角”一词相近，英语对译为perspective;“视域”又是哲学用词，英语对译为horizon,是胡塞尔现象学的关键概念。“视域”在方法论层面可以作为一种研究方法，按照类型可划分为：理论视域、比较视域、学科视域等；不具备方法意义或不能起分析框架作用的“视域”不适合作为方法。“视域”类论文的套路化和井喷现象值得审视和反思，存在外来学术话语如何本土化、什么问题适合开展多视域研究、是否引发学科危机等方面的争议。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are so many papers that the titles are about “Shiyu”(Perspective) in Chinese academic journals. But few researchers defined the word what it exactly means. This paper discusses the meaning and development of the Chinese term “Shiyu” and how it is used in educational research on methodology. Usually it means “perspective” or “view” in English. And it’s also a philosophical concept as the translation of “horizon”, which is the core concept of Husserl’s phenomenology. There are more than three types of the “Shiyu”(Perspective) when it is used as the education method. For example, there are the “theoretic type”, the “comparative type”, the “disciplinary type”, etc. A “field of view” that does not have methodological significance or does not serve as a framework for analysis is not suitable as a method. It is worthwhile to examine and reflect on the phenomenon of the clichéd and proliferating papers on “perspectives”. The situation of the term’s indiscriminate use in educational research is becoming worse. It will cause a disciplinary crisis of pedagogy in China and other problems.更多还原