【摘要】 本文通过自建现代汉语学术论文语料库，考察自我提及语如“我们”“我”“笔者”“本文”等的学科分布。研究发现，“我们”在软学科和硬学科论文中均有使用，而“我”仅出现在文学、历史和哲学论文中，其使用受学者身份等因素制约；作者自称名词“笔者”在软学科论文中有不同程度的使用，在硬学科中仅生物学论文有少量使用；抽象主体名词“本文”在软硬学科论文中使用较为普遍。总体上，不同自我提及语在软硬学科论文中的使用受主观性影响，呈现一个连续统。通过对应分析的多元统计发现，与自我提及语共现的动词呈现出多样性。其中，语言学论文自我提及语的使用表现介于软学科和硬学科之间。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper examines the disciplinary distribution of self-mention markers such as“women”(we), “wo”(I), “bizhe”(the author)and “ben wen”(the article)through a self-built Chinese academic paper corpus. The study finds that “women” is used in both soft and hard disciplines papers, while“wo” only appeares in literature, history and philosophy papers, and its use is often affected by such factors as scholar’s identity, etc. The author’s self-proclaimed noun “bizhe” is used in soft disciplines papers in varying degrees, and is used rarely in biology papers in hard disciplines. The abstract subject noun “ben wen” is commonly used in soft and hard disciplines papers. In general, the usage of different self-mention markers in hard and soft disciplines papers is influenced by subjectivity and is presented as a continuum. The paper also finds that verbs that co-occur with self-mention markers show diversity. The linguistics is found to be intermediate between soft and hard science papers through multivariate statistical methods of correspondence analysis.更多还原