节点文献

减污降碳协同增效背景下社会公众参与空气质量治理的效应研究——基于中国35个重点城市的现实考察

Research on the Effect of Public Participation in Air Quality Governance under the Background of Synergistic Effect of Pollution Reduction and Carbon Abatement:Based on the Survey of 35 Key Cities in China

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张济建侯子雄丁绪辉尹星

【Author】 ZHANG Ji-jian;HOU Zi-xiong;DING Xu-hui;YIN Xing;School of Finance and Economics,Jiangsu University;

【通讯作者】 丁绪辉;

【机构】 江苏大学财经学院

【摘要】 当前空气污染问题日益严重,传统的政府单边治理模式收效甚微,推动公众参与空气污染治理成为重要抓手。文章从非正式制度规制的公众参与视角入手,在理论机制分析基础之上,利用2010~2019年中国35个重点城市的面板数据,引入调节效应模型与面板门槛模型实证探究了社会公众参与空气质量治理的影响效应。研究发现:公众参与空气质量治理可以产生显著的积极效应,并且能够与环境污染治理投资额度的提高凝成政府与市场的合力,更有效地协同促进空气质量提升;随着GDP的增长,公众愈发积极地参与空气质量治理会使城市空气质量“先提升、后下降、再提升”;此外,公众参与空气质量治理的积极效应还存在城市能级异质性,相较于一线和新一线城市,非一线城市的空气质量提升效果更为明显。鉴于此,应充分发挥社会公众的环保监督作用,构建多种规制方式协调的综合环境治理体系;并注意与经济发展相协同,针对不同城市类型因地制宜地制定环境保护和公众参与的施政策略,以有效提升城市空气质量。

【Abstract】 At present,the problem of air pollution is becoming more and more serious,and the traditional government unilateral governance model has little effect. Promoting public participation in air pollution control has become an important starting point. Starting from the perspective of public participation in informal institutional regulation,based on the analysis of theoretical mechanism,the paper uses the panel data of 35 key cities in China from 2010 to 2019 to introduce the moderating effect model and panel threshold model to empirically explore the impact of public participation in air quality governance. The study found that public participation in air quality control can have a significant positive effect,and can form a joint force between the government and the market with the increase of investment in environmental pollution control,and more effectively promote air quality improvement;with the growth of GDP,the public’s increasingly active participation in air quality governance will make urban air quality’ first increase,then decrease,and then increase’;in addition,the positive effects of public participation in air quality governance also have urban energy level heterogeneity. Compared with first-tier and new first-tier cities,the air quality improvement effect of non-firsttier cities is more obvious.In view of this,we should give full play to the role of public environmental supervision,to build a variety of regulatory coordination of integrated environmental governance system;and pay attention to coordination with economic development, according to different types of cities to develop environmental protection and public participation in governance strategies to effectively improve urban air quality.

【基金】 国家自科基金青年项目“双向水污染流动风险下长江经济带水环境治理逐顶竞争机制研究”(72204099);江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队建设项目资助(SJSZ2020-20)
  • 【文献出处】 西北人口 ,Northwest Population Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2023年02期
  • 【分类号】X51
  • 【下载频次】109
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络