节点文献

基于机器学习的入侵检测模型对比研究

Comparison Research on Intrusion Detection Model Based on Machine Learning

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张鹏飞

【Author】 Zhang Pengfei;School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University;Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital;

【机构】 上海交通大学网络空间安全学院上海市皮肤病医院

【摘要】 如今网络威胁不断衍变、隐蔽性越来越强,研究多种机器学习模型在现代流量数据上的入侵检测性能与特性,对提升入侵检测系统的时效性有较大意义.探索采用近些年高效机器学习模型,包括集成学习(如随机森林、LightGBM、XGBoost)与深度学习(如卷积、GRU、LSTM等)模型在公开数据集UNSW-NB15上进行入侵检测任务.详细阐述任务流程与实验配置,对比分析不同模型评估指标,得出各模型在入侵检测任务中的特性.实践表明,在10%抽样数据集下,实验模型中二分类任务性能效率最优模型为LightGBM,F1分数为0.897,准确率为89.86%,训练时间为1.98 s,预测时间为0.11 s;实验中多分类任务最全面的检测模型为XGBoost, F1分数为0.790 7,准确率为75.96%,训练时间为144.79 s,预测时间为0.21 s.

【Abstract】 Nowadays, network threats are constantly evolving and demonstrate increasing invisibility. Studying the performance and characteristics of multiple machine learning models for intrusion detection on modern traffic data is of greater significance to improve the timeliness of intrusion detection systems. This paper explores the use of recent efficient machine learning models, including ensemble learning(Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM) and deep learning(CNN, LSTM, GRU, etc) models for intrusion detection tasks on the public dataset UNSW-NB15.We elaborate the task flow and experimental configuration, compare and analyze the experimental results of different models, summarize the characteristics of each model in the network intrusion detection task. The experimental results demonstrate that, under a 10% sampled dataset of UNSW-NB15, the best-performing model for the binary classification task among the experimental models is LightGBM, with an F1 score of 0.897, an accuracy of 89.86%, a training time of 1.98 s, and a prediction time of 0.11 s. In the case of multi-classification tasks, the most comprehensive prediction model among the experimental models is XGBoost, with an overall F1 score of 0.790 7, an accuracy of 75.96%, a training time of 144.79 s, and a prediction time of 0.21 s.

  • 【文献出处】 信息安全研究 ,Journal of Information Security Research , 编辑部邮箱 ,2023年08期
  • 【分类号】TP181;TP393.08
  • 【下载频次】44
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络