【摘要】 在跨境代孕中，外国法院判决因与接受国的公共秩序相违背，接受国往往拒绝承认外国法院判决认定的亲子关系，损害了各方利益，尤其是儿童权益。现有公共秩序保留的理论学说有客观结果说、客观联系说、主观说，在解决跨境代孕中公共秩序保留问题时都存在不同程度的局限性，儿童最大利益原则也难以与公共秩序保留制度进行权衡。鉴于此，可从国内与国际两方面探究限制接受国对公共秩序保留适用的路径。在国内，将客观结果说与跨国公共秩序理论相结合，降低公共秩序保留的启动机率；在国际，以《海牙跨国收养公约》为蓝本，为跨境代孕公约的制定提供借鉴与参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 In cross-border surrogacy, the foreign court judgment is contrary to the public order of the receiving country, and the receiving country often refuses to recognize the parent-child relationship determined by the foreign court judgment. It harms the interests of all parties, especially the rights of children. The existing theories and theories of public order retention include objective results, objective connections and subjective theory. There are different limitations in solving the problem of cross-border surrogacy, and the principle of children’s best interests is difficult to balance with the public order retention system. In view of this, the path to restrict the application of public order can be explored from both domestic and international aspects. Domestically, combining objective results with the theory of transnational public order can reduce the starting rate of public order retention; internationally, the Hague Convention on Transnational Adoption provides reference for the formulation of cross-border surrogacy convention.更多还原