人民城市治理的主体、权力与体制

【摘要】 <正>近些年来，关于城市治理的讨论和实践，主要涉及城市治理的效能、城市精细化治理、智慧城市建设、应急管理、社区治理等领域；但大多忽略了能够决定上述城市治理领域的基础性或者说根本性问题，那就是关于城市治理主体、城市治理权以及城市治理体制的问题。城市治理主体问题解决到底是谁以及应该是谁执掌治理城市的权力并治理城市；更多还原

【Abstract】 Today’s China can be called “urban China”. Urban construction has long been carrying the national mission, social welfare and people’s happiness, driving the miraculous leap of Chinese path to modernization. Guided by the concept of people’s city, the new model of Chinese-style cities is emerging. Professor Ma Xiheng pointed out that on the basis of further clarifying the inherent logic between the people’s city and the municipal social governance, we need to promote the construction of the municipal social community and provide basic support and powerful engines for Chinese-style modernization. Professor Sang Yucheng believes that we should focus on building a city governance system with the cooperation of government and society, balance of power and rights, and complementarity of system and technology. Professor Huang Xiaochun proposed that we should solve the key bottlenecks in the construction of the people’s city with the concept of whole-process people participation, and promote the integration of wholeprocess people participation into relevant reforms related to urban governance modernization. Professor Tian Yipeng believes that avoiding “civil engineering” and “singularity”, and organically combining the three forces of government, market and society are the keys to the construction of a complete community in the future. Professor He Xuesong focuses on “livable cities” and believes that the “people-centered” proximity requires the construction of a neighboring living circle, a neighboring cooperation network, and a neighboring emotional community, which will lay a solid foundation for the people’s city. Professor Liu Neng focuses on “resilient cities” and points out that the evolution from resilient cities to resilient people’s cities will incorporate the overall welfare of the entire population of the city, fully reflecting the basic meaning of people’s cities. Associate Professor Ge Tianren focused on “smart cities” and proposed a new Chinese-style “trinity” model of modern urban governance. Professor Min Xueqin proposed that urban governance in the context of urban culture should allow culture to return to the city, govern the city with culture, and make culture a bridge to promote connections between people, people and cities, people and the past, people and the future.更多还原