【摘要】 学术大师在学科发展中发挥着引领性作用，是世界一流学科的重要标志，是我国世界一流学科建设的关键。为明晰我国一流学科和世界一流学科在学术大师方面的表现及差异，以理工科为例，本文在结合学术大师内涵、借鉴学术大师评价相关文献的基础上，甄选国际可比性和高精尖评价指标，完成了我国一流理工科学术大师的指数设计，并通过对91位学科专家进行访谈验证了指数设计的合理性；运用设计的指数定量比较了我国一流理工科和世界一流理工科在学术大师方面的表现，并结合学科专家的调研结果和相关文献对比较的结果展开了分析。结果表明：我国一流理工科与世界一流理工科还存在明显的差距；人才评价体系、学术环境等因素是造成差距的主要原因。最后，提出了构建以质量内涵和实际贡献为核心的人才评价体系、加快营造“自由、公平”的学术环境等可行性政策建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 To clarify the performance of academic master of first-class science and engineering disciplines of China and worldclass science and engineering disciplines, this study build a evaluation system with top grade indicators, quantitatively compare the performance of first-class science and engineering disciplines of China and world-class science and engineering disciplines, and analyze the results based on the interview of the subject experts and references. The results show that there is an significant gap between the first-class science and engineering disciplines of China and world-class science and engineering disciplines. Talent evaluation system, academic environment and other factors are the main reasons for the gap. The talent evaluation system with quality connotation and practical contribution, free and fair academic environment are needed.更多还原