【摘要】 论文代表作的科学遴选是保障代表作评价制度落地的基础工作，对当前“破五唯”的大背景下如何立新标具有重要的理论和方法指导意义。本文首先探析了论文代表作的内涵与遴选视角，在此基础上阐释了遴选模型构建的理论和实践两个思想来源，接着从权威施引者和引用评论等级两个方面综合考量，构建了论文代表作遴选模型。最后，基于物理学领域国家自然科学奖入围项目展开实证研究，结果表明，本文提出的遴选模型是一种典型的“优中选优”模型，能够较为精准地从申请人的众多论文中挑选出代表作。同时，与他引次数和影响因子进行比较分析，进一步证实了本文模型的优越性——更具鉴别力且更稳定。更多还原

【Abstract】 The scientific selection of representative paper is the basic work that ensures the implementation of the representative work evaluation system. It is theoretically and methodologically crucial to establish a novel alternative under the current background of “breaking the five-only.” This study first probes into the connotation of representative paper and the selection perspectives. Then it elaborates on the idea sources of selection models from theoretical and empirical perspectives. Furthermore, the selection model combing authority citer and citation comment classification is developed. Subsequently, the empirical research based on candidate projects of the National Natural Science Award in the field of physics is conducted. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed selection model is a typical model of “selecting the best from best,” which can accurately select representative papers from several papers of applicants. Meanwhile, compared with non-self-citation count and impact factor, it further proves that the mode is superior — more discriminative and more stable.更多还原