【摘要】 季卫东在讨论法律程序的意义时提出了“新程序主义”的主张。按照这一范式，不仅监管机构在处理价值观的多样性时必须保持中立的立场，而且必须负责促进这些不同立场之间的互动，特别是在对话、理解、合法化和建立共识方面。并且，任何决定，只要涉及公共利益的问题，除了国家机构作出的专业判断外，都应在整个社会范围内自由交流意见。换言之，沟通和自治是支撑这种建立共识的制度化机制的两大支柱。那么，“新程序主义”究竟“新”在何处？这一点在学界也一度引发争论，本文希望从阿伦特所提出的“显现空间”命题，将法律程序放置在一个更加广泛的社会空间背景之中来加以考察，由此来彰显法律程序在凝聚共识、促进社会沟通这一维度上的意义和价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 In discussing the significance of legal procedure, Ji Weidong puts forward “new proceduralism”.According to this paradigm, the regulator must maintain a neutral position when dealing with the diversity of values and promote the interaction among these different positions, especially in dialogue, mutual understanding, legalization and consensus-building. In addition, any decision, as long as it is concerned with public interests, will need to enable the free exchange of opinions in the whole society, in addition to the professional judgement made by state agencies. In other words, communication and autonomy are the two pillars that support this institutionalized system of consensus-building. So what is the key to “new proceduralism”? This has been a contentious issue among the Chinese academic community in recent years. Based on “space of appearance” proposed by Arendt, the legal procedure will be examined in a wider socio-spatial context, in an attempt to demonstrate the significance and values of legal procedure in the dimension of consensus-building and the promotion of social communication.更多还原