【摘要】 通过对江苏省法院近3年农村房屋买卖纠纷裁判的梳理，发现判决是否有效与买受主体身份、购买时间等之间有错综复杂的关系，故仅凭合同效力判断不能体系化解决宅基地房屋买卖纠纷。应根据民事法律关系理论，在区分宅基地房屋买受人的基础上建构买受人对土地的权利。如买受人为本集体经济组织成员，那么买卖合同应以有效为原则；如有违“一户一宅”形成超占，则应对超占部分引入有偿使用制度。如买受人为非本集体成员，村民买受则应认可合同效力，市民买受则应平衡利益。权利构造的立法论上市民买受的土地权利可转为集体建设用地所有权或建构宅基地使用权次类型。更多还原

【Abstract】 Through studying the verdicts on rural house purchases disputes given by the courts in Jiangsu in recent three years, we find that the relationship between the validity of the judgment and the identity of the subject and the purchase time is complicated. Therefore, only the validity of the contract judgment can not systematize the settlement of the homestead housing sale dispute. According to the theory of civil legal relations, the buyer’s right to land should be constructed on the basis of distinguishing the homestead buyers. If the buyer is a member of the collective economic organization, then the sales contract shall be valid as the principle; If the violation of the “one household, one house” leads to the formation of excess, the excess part should be covered by paid use system. If they are not members of the collective, the villagers should accept the validity of the contract and the public should balance the interests. On the legislation of the right structure, the land rights purchased by citizens can be converted into the ownership of collective construction land or the right to use construction housing land.更多还原