【摘要】 目的:比较热稀释法与间接Fick法测量的心输出量在左心疾病相关肺高血压(PH-LHD)患者中的差异，探讨两种方法测定的心指数与患者预后的关系。方法:连续收集2013年9月—2021年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院心内科经右心导管检查确诊PH-LHD患者的临床资料及随访数据。随访截至2022年4月，主要终点事件为全因死亡。采用Pearson相关系数及Bland-Altman散点图评估两种心输出量测量方法的相关性与一致性。采用X-tile软件计算心指数的最佳临界值。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线及Cox回归模型评价热稀释法与间接Fick法测定的心指数在PH-LHD患者中的预后价值。结果:纳入分析的238例PH-LHD患者，热稀释法测定的心输出量为(4.03±1.46) L/min,间接Fick法测定的心输出量为(3.39±1.20) L/min,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。热稀释法与间接Fick法心输出量呈中度正相关(r=0.680,P<0.001)。两者心输出量的差值均值为0.64 L/min,一致性界限为-1.50～2.78 L/min,百分比误差>20%的比例为53.4%,心输出量差值>1 L/min的比例为38.2%。根据X-tile软件计算的最佳临界值将热稀释法及间接Fick法心指数分为低、中、高水平3组。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示，热稀释法心指数的组间生存率比较差异有统计学意义(log-rank P=0.016);间接Fick法心指数的组间生存率比较差异无统计学意义(log-rank P=0.450)。Cox回归模型中，根据年龄、性别进行校正，热稀释法心指数每增加1 L/min/m~2,患者的死亡风险降低25%(P=0.038),中水平组、低水平组的死亡风险相比于高水平组分别增加了169%(P=0.034)及252%(P=0.011);进一步校正多重混杂因素后，热稀释法心指数不具有独立的预测价值。间接Fick法心指数作为连续变量及分组变量均与患者的全因死亡无关。结论:热稀释法与间接Fick法心输出量在PH-LHD患者中呈中度正相关，但一致性欠佳。热稀释法心指数对PH-LHD患者预后有一定预测价值，而间接Fick法心指数的预后价值并不理想。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To compare the difference in cardiac output measured by thermodilution and indirect Fick methods in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease(PH-LHD), and to investigate the relationship between the calculated cardiac index and prognosis. Methods: Clinical data and follow-up information were collected from PH-LHD patients diagnosed by right heart catheterization in the Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from September 2013 to December 2021. Patients were followed up until April 2022, with the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman scatter plots were used to evaluate the correlation and consistency of the two measurement methods. The optimal cutoff values for the cardiac index categories were determined using the X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic value of the cardiac index determined by the thermodilution and indirect Fick methods in PH-LHD patients. Results: A total of 238 PH-LHD patients were included. The cardiac output measured by thermodilution was(4.03±1.46) L/min, and that measured by indirect Fick was(3.39±1.20) L/min, with a statistically significant difference(P<0.001). The cardiac outputs measured by thermodilution and indirect Fick had a moderately positive correlation(r=0.680, P<0.001). The mean difference in cardiac output between the two methods was 0.64 L/min, with a consistency limit of-1.50-2.78 L/min, and a percentage error>20% of 53.4%. The proportion of patients with a difference in cardiac output>1 L/min was 38.2%. Based on the optimal critical values calculated by X-tile, the Kaplan-Meier curve showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the survival rate between the thermodilution cardiac index groups(log-rank P=0.016), but not in the indirect Fick cardiac index groups(log-rank P=0.450). After adjusting for age and sex, for each 1 L/min/m~2increase in the thermodilution cardiac index, the risk of death decreased by 25%(P=0.038), and the risk of death in the middle and low cardiac index groups increased by 169%(P=0.034) and 252%(P=0.011), respectively, compared with the high cardiac index group. After further adjusting for multiple confounding factors, however, both the thermodilution and indirect Fick-measured cardiac index, as a continuous or categorical variable, did not show a significant association with all-cause mortality. Conclusion: There is a moderate positive correlation between the cardiac outputs measured by thermodilution and indirect Fick methods in PH-LHD patients, but the consistency is poor. The thermodilution cardiac index demonstrates a certain predictive value for the prognosis of PH-LHD patients, while the prognostic value of the indirect Fick cardiac index is not ideal.更多还原