【摘要】 【目的】构建科普研究类学术期刊评价体系，为发展和评价我国科普研究类学术期刊提供参考。【方法】采用文献调查法，以全评价体系为理论框架，探讨科普研究类学术期刊的概念和特征，搭建科普研究类学术期刊的评价体系，提炼出科普研究类学术期刊评价的相关指标。【结果】构建包含形式评价、内容评价、效用评价3个一级指标，学术影响、新闻传播等9个二级指标及其下属33个三级指标的科普研究类学术期刊评价体系，实现对科普研究类学术期刊系统、全面、专业的评价。【结论】所构建的科普研究类学术期刊评价体系是合理、可行的，能够对科普研究类学术期刊评价领域进行补充。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purposes] The study aims to construct an evaluation system for science popularization research academic journals, providing references for the development and evaluation of such journals in China. [Methods] With the literature survey method and the full evaluation system as the theoretical framework, the study explored the concept and characteristics of science popularization research academic journals, established an evaluation system for such journals, and extracted relevant indicators for evaluating them. [Findings] An evaluation system for science popularization research academic journals is developed, consisting of three primary indicators of formal evaluation, content evaluation, and utility evaluation, nine secondary indicators containing academic influence, news dissemination, and others, and thirty-three tertiary indicators. This evaluation system enables a systematic, comprehensive, and professional evaluation of science popularization research academic journals. [Conclusions] The constructed evaluation system for science popularization research academic journals is reasonable and feasible, and it can supplement the evaluation of such journals in this domain.更多还原