【摘要】 违约方解除合同作为解决合同僵局的新路径，是司法实践的产物。《民法典》对“违约方合同解除权”的适用及其作用机制尚且未做出明确规定，学术界对该问题的争议较大。因此对合同僵局现有应对机制凸显的困境进行反思，对适用“违约方合同解除权”的学界观点进行分析，有助于厘清“违约方合同解除权”的权利属性，进而推动“违约方合同解除权”的作用机制在理论和实践中得到完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a new way to resolve the deadlock in the contract, the termination of the contract by the breaching party is a product of judicial practice. The Civil Code has not clearly stipulated the application of the " breaching party’s right to cancel the contract" and its mechanism of function, and the academic community has a great deal of controversy over this issue. Therefore, reflecting on the dilemma highlighted by the existing response mechanism of contract deadlock, and analyzing the academic viewpoint of applying the "breaching party’s right to cancel the contract", it is helpful to clarify the right attributes of the "breaching party’s right to cancel the contract", and then promote the improvement of the mechanism of "breaching party’s right to cancel the contract" in theory and practice.更多还原