【摘要】 近些年来盛行的国内高校教师评价活动，科研导向、定量方式、绩效至上始终占据着主导地位，反映出只重事实层面的合理性而轻价值层面正当性的现象。高校教师评价取向与标准主要非来自理论逻辑的自洽，而是现实中外部力量对高校学术生态的强力介入及其与高校博弈的结果，进而形塑了教师的工作生活方式以及学术信念与行动偏好。因此，从价值层面对时下评价制度的结果逻辑、计数逻辑与绩效逻辑予以全面检思，继而调适教师评价目的性与工具性价值间的张力尤为必要。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years, the prevalent evaluation activities in university faculties have always been dominated by scientific research orientation, quantitative method, and performance orientation, reflecting the phenomenon that only emphasizes the rationalities at the factual level and ignores the legitimacy at the value level. The evaluation orientation and standards of university faculties are not mainly derived from the self-consistent theoretical logic, but from the strong interventions of external forces in the academic ecology of universities and the results of competitions among universities in reality, which in turn shapes faculties work life styles, academic beliefs, and action preferences. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively reflect on the result logic, counting logic, and performance logic of the current evaluation system at the value level, so as to adjust the tension between the purpose value and instrumental value of faculty evaluation.更多还原