【摘要】 宏观审慎评估体系（MPA）是我国在“双支柱”框架下的重要探索和创新，旨在规范商业银行的经营行为，降低其风险承担。MPA于2016年首次提出，于2017年升级。本文利用2009—2018年中国47家商业银行的资产负债表数据，推算银行广义信贷规模，通过设计双重差分模型，探究MPA对银行广义信贷和信用风险的影响。研究结果表明：第一，MPA的实施显著抑制银行广义信贷的过快扩张，并且显著降低银行信用风险。第二，MPA对银行广义信贷的影响存在结构差异。面临考核压力的银行倾向于先压缩非狭义类型信贷规模，但对狭义信贷和表外理财的抑制作用并不显著，这将推动银行资产配置结构的转变。第三，以上结论在基于资本充足率的分组与基于广义信贷增速的分组中保持一致，表明实施MPA的政策效果是稳健的。更多还原

【Abstract】 As an essential exploration and innovation under the two-pillar framework, the macroprudential assessment system(MPA) aims to supervise the business behavior of commercial banks and reduce their risk-taking. MPA was first proposed in 2016 and further upgraded in 2017. However, its policy effect evaluation has yet to be involved in the current research.This paper focuses on two profound changes in MPA, using the balance sheet data of 47 commercial banks in China from 2009 to 2018. Firstly, this paper calculates the broad credit scale of banks. Secondly, this paper groups banks according to the regulatory pressure faced by banks and empirically explores the impact of MPA on banks′ broad credit and credit risk by designing a difference in difference(DID) model.The results show that: firstly, the implementation of MPA significantly inhibits the banks′ broad credit expansion and significantly reduces the banks′ credit risk-taking behaviors. Secondly, there are structural differences in the impact of MPA on banks′ broad credit. Banks tend to reduce the scale of non-narrow credit first. However, the inhibitory effect on the growth of narrow loans and off-balance sheet financing is insignificant, promoting the transformation of banks′ asset allocation structure.Thirdly, the grouping results based on the capital adequacy ratio are consistent with those based on broad credit growth, and the policy effect is stable.更多还原