节点文献

论我国《反外国制裁法》第12条中的侵权行为及其责任

On Torts and Liability Under Article 12 of China’s Anti-Foreign Sanctions Act

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨永红杨运涛

【Author】 Yang Yonghong;Yang Yuntao;

【机构】 西南政法大学国际法学院西南政法大学

【摘要】 我国《反外国制裁法》第12条赋予了受到外国歧视性限制措施侵害的我国公民和组织向法院起诉的司法救济权。如何在实践中运用上述救济权,我们有必要从如下三个角度展开研究。从侵权行为的角度出发,我国《反外国制裁法》中执行和协助执行歧视性限制措施的行为,具有民法上侵权行为的基本特征,我国法院应当依托《民法典》审理《反外国制裁法》中的侵权之诉。从侵权责任的角度出发,上述行为构成含有帮助行为的共同侵权行为,其中外国公主体是实行人,外国境内的私主体是帮助人,二者承担相应的责任且有可能构成紧急避险。从侵权赔偿责任角度出发,被侵害人是我国公民或组织,同时其受损害的合法权益是财产或人身自由权益,其应当具有损害赔偿请求权。

【Abstract】 Article 12 of China’s “Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law” endows Chinese citizens and organizations who have been infringed by foreign discriminatory restrictive measures with the right to sue in court for judicial relief. How to use the above relief right in practice, we need to conduct research from the following three perspectives. From the perspective of torts, the behavior of implementing and assisting in the implementation of discriminatory restrictive measures in the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law has the characteristics of torts in civil law. Chinese courts should rely on the Civil Code to hear the infringement lawsuit of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law. From the perspective of tort liability, the above-mentioned acts constitute a joint tort involving assisting acts, in which the foreign public entity is the executor, and the private party in the foreign country is the helper. The two bear corresponding responsibilities and may constitute necessity. From the perspective of tort compensation liability, the victim is a citizen or organization of China, and at the same time, its legal rights and interests are property or personal freedom rights, it should have the right to claim damages.

【基金】 国家社科基金西部项目“反外国金融制裁实施机制研究(22XFX009);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB22183)”的阶段性成果;中国—东盟法律研究中心(东盟研究院)资助
  • 【文献出处】 国际经济法学刊 ,Journal of International Economic Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2023年02期
  • 【分类号】D997;D922.295
  • 【下载频次】124
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络