节点文献

高品质鲜食番茄品种比较

Comparison of high quality fresh edible tomato

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 连丽强; 李静; 任桐桐; 赵文超; 杨瑞; 黄煌; 王绍辉; 孙路路;

【Author】 LIAN Liqiang;LI Jing;REN Tongtong;ZHAO Wenchao;YANG Rui;HUANG Huang;WANG Shaohui;SUN Lulu;College of Plant Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture;

【通讯作者】 孙路路;

【机构】 北京农学院植物科学技术学院;

【摘要】 【目的】为筛选出适合北京地区无土栽培模式种植并推广的高品质鲜食番茄品种。【方法】以主栽鲜食番茄品种普罗旺斯为对照品种,对无土栽培模式下8个鲜食番茄品种植株的田间长势、抗病性进行观察评价,同时对8个品种番茄果实的果色、果形指数、单果质量、硬度、可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、可滴定酸、糖酸比、维生素C含量和番茄红素含量等外观、风味和营养品质指标进行分析。【结果】京番701、瑞粉882植株长势较旺,京番701、瑞粉882、京采6号田间较抗病毒病,京番309、京采6号果实转色较早;各品种果形指数都在0.77~0.87之间,为近圆形,属于较优果形;京番701和瑞粉882果实为大果,其余品种为中小果。京番309、瑞粉882、京采6号果实硬度较低;甜脆脆、原味1号、京番308、京番309可溶性固形物含量较高;甜脆脆、京番701、京番308可溶性糖含量较高;普罗旺斯、京采6号、瑞粉882可滴定酸含量较低;普罗旺斯、京番308和京采6号糖酸比较高;京番309、京番701、原味1号维生素C含量较高;瑞粉882、甜脆脆、原味1号番茄红素含量较高。依据各指标在鲜食番茄品种比较中的重要程度不同赋予不同的权重,进行综合评价,结果显示各品种均比对照品种普罗旺斯综合评分高,甜脆脆综合评价最优,其次为京番308和原味1号。【结论】本栽培条件下甜脆脆、京番308和原味1号为更适合的高品质鲜食番茄品种,可供鲜食或观光采摘使用。

【Abstract】 [Objective]The experiment is in order to screen out high-quality fresh edible tomato suitable for soilless cultivation condition in Beijing area. [Methods]The growth and disease resistance of 8 fresh edible tomato under soilless cultivation were observed and evaluated. Meanwhile, the appearance, flavor and nutritional quality indexes of 8 tomato, such as fruit color, fruit shape index, fruit weight, hardness, soluble solid, soluble sugar, titratable acid, sugar-acid ratio, vitamin C and lycopene content, were also analyzed. The fresh edible tomato Provence was used as a control in this experiment. [Results] Jingfan 701 and Ruifen 882 grew more vigorously among the 8 tomato, and Jingfan 701, Ruifen 882 and Jingcai 6 showed stronger resistance to virus diseases. Meanwhile, the fruits of Jingfan 309 and Jingcai 6 turned to color earlier. The fruit shape of all varieties was nearly round, and the fruit shape index was between 0.77 and 0.87, and Jingfan 701 and Ruifen 882 had larger fruits, when the fruits of other varieties were smaller. Jingfan 309, Ruifen 882 and Jingcai 6 had lower fruit hardness, and Tiancuicui, Yuanwei 1, Jingfan 308 and Jingfan 309 contained higher soluble solids. Tiancuicui, Jingfan 701 and Jingfan 308 had high levels of soluble sugar, and Provence, Jingcai 6 and Ruifen 882 contained lower titratable acid, and Provence, Jingfan 308 and Jingcai 6 had higher sugar-acid ratio. Jingfan 309, Jingfan 701 and Yuanwei 1 contained higher vitamin C content, when Ruifen 882, Tiancuicui and Yuanwei 1 contained higher levels of lycopene. According to the importance of each index in the comparison of fresh edible tomato, different weights were given for comprehensive evaluation. The results showed that the comprehensive score of Tiancuicui was the highest, followed by Jingfan 308 and Yuanwei 1, and the score of all were higher than the control. [Conclusion]Tiancuicui, Jingfan 308 and Yuanwei 1 were better high quality fresh edible tomato for fresh eating or sightseeing or plucking under soilless cultivation in Beijing area.

【关键词】 鲜食番茄; 外观; 品质; 综合评价;
【Key words】 fresh edible tomato; appearance; quality; comprehensive evaluation;
【基金】 北京市自然科学基金项目—北京市教育委员会科技计划重点项目(KZ202010020027);平谷高效设施蔬菜生产关键技术研究与集成应用子课题——番茄工厂化生产环境因子与产量及品质的数据挖掘及调控技术研究
  • 【文献出处】 北京农学院学报 ,Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture , 编辑部邮箱 ,2023年01期
  • 【分类号】S641.2
  • 【下载频次】96
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络