【摘要】 学界对周宣王“不籍千亩”与千亩之战的研究，历来存在争议。清华简《系年》的公布，推动了相关研究的进一步拓展。通过考察相关文献与论著可以看出，《国语》和《左传》是研究千亩之战相关问题的基本依据，《史记》不同篇章中的不同说法是由各卷主题需要所决定的，古本《竹书纪年》中的记录体现了尊王观念，这些关于千亩之战结局的记载实际上并无矛盾。杜预关于千亩地望的解释对后世千亩之战发生两次说以及两次战果不同说的出现具有重要影响。清华简《系年》进一步验证了《国语》记载的可信度，这是其在此问题研究上的最大价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 There has always been a controversy about the study of Zhou Xuanwang’s “Bujie Qianmu” and “the Battle of Qianmu”. Xinian of Tsinghua’s bamboo slips promoted the further development of relevant research. It can be seen from the relevant literature and works that Guoyu and Zuozhuan are the basis for the study of the issues related to the Battle of Qianmu, different opinions in different chapters of Shiji are determined by the needs of each volume’s theme, and the records in the ancient version of Zhushujinian embody the concept of respecting the king. There is no contradiction in these records about the outcome of the Battle of Qianmu. Du Yu’s explanation about the location of Qianmu has an important influence on the opinions of “two times of occurrence”and “different results of two battles” concerning the Battle of Qianmu in later generations. Xinian of Tsinghua’s bamboo slips further verifies the credibility of the records in Guoyu, which is the greatest value of its research on this issue.更多还原