【摘要】 为了对比2种包埋术治疗犬第三眼睑腺脱出的疗效，本试验将6只试验犬平均分为2个组，Ⅰ组用袋状包埋术、Ⅱ组用锚定技术进行治疗，评估术前以及术后0、1、4、7 d和14 d犬结膜充血、精神、食欲、眼表感染、荧光素钠染色评分情况，并检测眼内压、泪液值、C反应蛋白(CRP)值和白细胞数。结果显示，2个组术后试验犬结膜充血、食欲、荧光素钠染色、眼内压、泪液值差异不显著(P>0.05);2个组试验犬在术后0d皆出现术眼敏感，Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组分别在术后1 d、14 d恢复正常，差异显著(P<0.05);2个组试验犬术后炎性分泌物均先增加后减少，Ⅰ组术后7 d无分泌物，Ⅱ组术后14 d仍有分泌物，差异显著(P<0.05);术后0、1 d和4 d时，Ⅱ组CRP值和白细胞数均显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.05)。结果表明，袋状包埋术治疗犬第三眼睑腺脱出比锚定术疗效更佳。更多还原

【Abstract】 To compare the efficacy of two embedding procedures for the treatment of canine third eyelid gland prolapse. Six dogs were divided into two groups, group Ⅰ was treated with bag embedding technique and group Ⅱ was treated with anchoring technique. Then conjunctival hyperemia, mental status, appetite, ocular surface infection, fluorescein sodium staining scores were observed, and intraocular pressure, tear value, CRP value and white blood cell count were detected before and 0, 1, 4, 7 d and 14 d after operation. The results showed that there were no significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia, appetite, sodium fluorescein staining, intraocular pressure and tear values between the two groups after operation(P>0.05); operative eye sensitivity occurred in both groups at 0 d after operation, and returned to normal in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ, respectively, after 1 d and 14 d(P<0.05); at first, both groups’ s inflammatory secretions increased and then decreased, group Ⅰ had no secretion at 7 d after operation, while group Ⅱ still had secretion at 14 d after operation(P<0.05); group Ⅱ’s CRP value was always higher than group Ⅰ’s at 0, 1 d and 4 d after operation(P<0.05). At 0, 1 d and 4 d after operation, group Ⅱ’s white blood cell count was higher than group Ⅰ(P<0.05). Thus, bag embedding technique is more effective than anchoring technique for the treatment of canine third eyelid gland prolapse.更多还原