节点文献

单纯斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后融合器沉降与腰椎矢状面参数的关系

The relationship between cage subsidence and lumbar sagittal alignment after oblique lumbar interbody fusion stand-alone

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴海昊周春光汤涛刘军辉陈意磊范顺武赵凤东

【Author】 WU Haihao;ZHOU Chunguang;TANG Tao;Department of Orthopedics, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Ningbo No. 2 Hospital);

【通讯作者】 赵凤东;

【机构】 中国科学院大学宁波华美医院骨科浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院骨科

【摘要】 目的:探讨单纯斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(oblique lumbar interbody fusion,OLIF)术后融合器沉降与腰椎矢状面参数之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析117例接受单节段OLIF手术(无内固定)患者的临床资料,根据椎间隙高度(disc height,DH)下降程度分为融合器0级沉降组(0~24%)、Ⅰ级沉降组(25%~49%)、Ⅱ级沉降组(50%~74%)、Ⅲ级沉降组(75%~100%)。术后随访2年以上,比较各组间手术前后DH改善值(术后即刻DH-术前DH)、节段前凸角(segmental lordosis,SL)改善值(术后即刻SL-术前SL)、腰椎前凸角(lumbar lordosis,LL)改善值(术后即刻LL-术前LL)及末次随访时SL丢失值(末次随访SL-术后即刻SL)、LL丢失值(末次随访LL-术后即刻LL)。比较各组间术后1周及末次随访时的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。回归分析融合器沉降的危险因素。结果:本组中0级沉降106例,Ⅰ级沉降11例,未见Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级沉降,其中5例Ⅰ级沉降病例行再次手术。Ⅰ级沉降组手术前后DH改善值、SL改善值明显大于0级沉降组(P<0.05),LL改善值与0级沉降组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术前后DH改善值、SL改善值是融合器沉降的独立危险因素。Ⅰ级沉降组末次随访时SL丢失值、LL丢失值均明显大于0级沉降组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后VAS评分、ODI均较术前明显改善(P<0.05)。Ⅰ级沉降组术后1个月VAS评分、ODI均高于0级沉降组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅰ级沉降组末次随访VAS评分、ODI均显著高于0级沉降组(P<0.05)。结论:OLIF术中过多撑开椎间隙及增加节段前凸角可能导致融合器沉降,融合器沉降会引起手术节段前凸角及腰椎前凸角丢失,并且影响临床疗效。

【Abstract】 Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between cage subsidence and lumbar sagittal alignment after oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF) stand-alone. methods: In this study,the clinical data of 117 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF stand-alone were reviewed. Subsidence was classified using the following scale: grade 0, 0%-24% loss of postoperative disc height(DH); grade Ⅰ, 25%-49%; grade Ⅱ, 50%-74%; and grade Ⅲ, 75%-100%. All the patients were followed up for more than 2 years. DH improvement(postoperative DH-preoperative DH), segmental lordosis(SL) improvement(postoperative SL-preoperative SL), lumbar lordosis(LL) improvement(postoperative LL-preoperative LL) were evaluated,decrease of postoperative SL and LL were also recorded. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were compared. Logistic regression for cage subsidence after OLIF stand-alone was done. Results:All the operations were successfully done. 106 patients had grade 0 subsidence, 11 patients had grade Ⅰ subsidence, there was no grade Ⅱ, grade Ⅲ subsidence. 5 patients with grade Ⅰ subsidence underwent reoperation. The DH improvement and SL improvement in grade Ⅰ subsidence group was significantly larger than that in grade 0 subsidence group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in LL improvement in the two groups(P>0.05), DH improvement and SL improvement are independent risk factors for cage subsidence.The SL decrease and LL decrease in grade Ⅰ subsidence group was significantly larger than that in grade 0 subsidence group(P <0.05).postoperation(P <0.05), When comparing the two groups, The VAS scores and ODI scores in grade Ⅰ subsidence group was larger than that in grade 0 subsidence group at 1 month follow-up, but without statistical significance. The VAS scores and ODI scores in grade Ⅰ subsidence group was significantly larger than that in grade 0 subsidence group at the final follow-up(P<0.05). Conclusions: In OLIF stand-alone,excessive reconstruction of DH and SL may lead to cage subsidence. Cage subsidence could result in SL and LL decrease, and affect clinical outcome.

【基金】 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(编号2019KY178);宁波市自然科学基金项目(编号2019A610241)
  • 【文献出处】 中国脊柱脊髓杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord , 编辑部邮箱 ,2022年02期
  • 【分类号】R687.3
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】139
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络