【摘要】 目的 观察经尿道前列腺等离子电切术（TUPKRP）治疗良性前列腺增生（BPH）的临床效果。方法 60例BPH患者依据手术方式不同分为观察组和对照组各30例，对照组采用经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）治疗，观察组采用经尿道前列腺等离子切除术（TUPKRP）治疗。比较两组的手术相关指标、 IPSS评分、最大尿流率及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组术中出血量少于对照组，膀胱冲洗时间、尿管留置时间及住院时间短于对照组（P <0.05）。术后，观察组IPSS评分低于对照组，最大尿流率高于对照组（P <0.05）。观察组并发症发生率为20.00%，低于对照组的46.67%(P <0.05)。结论 与TURP相比，TUPKRP治疗BPH的效果更为显著，对患者创伤更小，术后并发症发生率更低，恢复更快。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To observe the clinical effect of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(TUPKRP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods 60 BPH patients were divided into observation group and control group according to different operation methods, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with transurethral resection of prostate(TURP), and the observation group was treated with TUPKRP. The operation-related indicators, IPSS score, maximum urinary flow rate and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss of the observation group was less than that of the control group, and the bladder washing time, catheter indwelling time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the control group(P <0.05). After operation, the IPSS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the maximum urinary flow rate was higher than that of the control group(P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 20.00%, lower than 46.67%in the control group(P <0.05). Conclusions Compared with TURP, TUPKRP has more significant effect in the treatment of BPH, with less trauma to patients, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and faster recovery of patients.更多还原