【摘要】 为预防及遏制虚假诉讼，与查明事实不符的虚假自认将不予确认。但司法实务中仍然频发的虚假自认揭示，事前仅靠效力否定无法完成规制，与此同时，事后规制体系存在救济程序网络无法为受虚假自认损害的案外人提供有效程序保障、虚假自认惩罚力度轻微的问题。为此，事前应进一步限缩自认的成立与效力范围，明确自认事实的范围、适用对象及成立场域、预决事实的自认例外。事后应建立完备的救济制度体系，筑高当事人虚假自认成本，包括明确受虚假诉讼损害的案外人以有独立请求权的第三人提起参加之诉与撤销之诉的适格地位；确立执行终结后延长的执行救济以提起损害赔偿之诉与不当得利之诉；检察机关可依案外人控告、举报提供线索对自认型虚假诉讼依职权启动监督，由此真正实现否定虚假自认效力的立法目的。更多还原

【Abstract】 In order to prevent and curb false litigation,false admission inconsistent with the facts shall not be confirmed. However,the frequent false admission in judicial practice reveals that the prior denial of effect alone cannot eliminate the occurrence of false self-admission. At the same time,the post regulation system has the problems that the relief program network cannot provide effective procedural guarantee for outsiders damaged by false admission,and the punishment of false admission is slight. Therefore,we should further limit the establishment and effectiveness of self-admission in advance,and clarify its scope,applicable object,establishment field and self-admission exceptions of pre-determined facts. Afterwards,a complete relief system should be established to increase the cost of false admission of the parties,including clarifying the qualified status of the third party with independent claim for the action of participation and that of cancellation; establish the extended execution relief after the termination of execution to bring the action of damage compensation and the action of unjust enrichment; The procuratorial organ can provide clues according to the complaints and reports of outsiders,and start the supervision of self-admission false litigation according to its authority,so as to realize the legislative purpose of negating the effectiveness of false self-admission.更多还原