【摘要】 公正处置涉案财物是刑事司法领域贯彻保障公民财产权的重要环节。长期以来，涉案财物处置依附于定罪量刑活动，对于涉案财物事实缺乏实质性审理，这一“合一型”模式不利于公民财产权的保护，涉案财物处置程序改革迫在眉睫。考虑到与定罪量刑程序的紧密衔接及涉案财物事实的复杂性，吸收量刑程序改革的有益经验以及实践先行带来的启示，当前应建构相对独立的涉案财物处置程序，促进涉案财物处置的公开化、透明化，限制法官自由裁量权，最大程度实现公正与效率的统一。相对独立的涉案财物处置程序依申请或依职权启动，通过发挥庭前会议功能，接受当事人及利害关系人的财产权争议及主张，决定是否开启针对独立性财物事实的专门审理，实现实质性审理。同时，应根据证明责任设置分层次的证明标准，在发生事实认定错误时进行必要的程序回转，保障事实认定的准确性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Fair disposal of property in criminal justice is an important part of the protection of citizens’ property rights. For a long time, the disposal of property involved in criminal cases has been dependent on conviction and sentencing activities, and property facts lack real trials. This "unified" model is unconducive to protecting citizens’ property rights, making it imperative to reform the disposal procedure for property involved in criminal cases. There exists a close connection between the disposal of property and the conviction and sentencing procedures, and property facts tend to be complex, while there is useful experience in sentencing procedure reforms and inspirations from practice. Considering these factors, we should construct relatively independent procedures for the disposal of property involved in criminal cases to promote openness and transparency in this activity, to limit the discretion of judges, and to maximize the unity of justice and efficiency. Such procedures can be activated either by the judge’s discretion or by application. The function of the pretrial conference should be performed to handle disputes and claims of property rights from parties and stakeholders, and to decide whether to open a special trial on the independent property facts or not, thereby achieving a real trial. A hierarchical standard of proof should be set according to the burden of proof. In the event of an error in facts-finding, the procedure should be reversed as necessary, in order to guarantee the accuracy of facts-finding.更多还原